Tumour markers as early predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma

被引:37
|
作者
Berglund, Å
Molin, D
Larsson, A
Einarsson, R
Glimelius, B
机构
[1] Univ Uppsala, Akad Sjukhuset, Sect Oncol, Dept Oncol Radiol & Clin Immunol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala, Akad Sjukhuset, Sect Oncol, Dept Med Sci, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] AB Sangtec Med, Div Res & Dev, Bromma, Sweden
关键词
bFGF; CEA; colorectal carcinoma; palliative chemotherapy; TPS; VEGF;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdf220
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To evaluate the reliability and validity of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in monitoring palliative chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) Methods: Serum was prospectively collected from 87 patients with ACRC treated with first-line 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin before and 2, 4 and 10 weeks after induction. Results: Eight patients had normal baseline TPS levels, and these patients had a favourable outcome with prolonged survival and a higher rate of objective responses than patients with elevated TPS levels. At 10 weeks, all responders had a decreasing TPS value. The sensitivity for a decrease of >25% using TPS was 83% and 86%, for objective and subjective responses, respectively, and the specificity was 65% and 72%, respectively. CEA had, in the same setting, a sensitivity of 45% and 46%, respectively. and the specificity was 88%. VEGF was elevated in 54% of the patients and bFGF in 15% of the patients. The VEGF values decreased during therapy in 94% of the patients, but the changes in serial VEGF values did not correlate with survival or response. Tumour markets used together did not enhance the predictive values of TPS alone. Conclusions: Repeated measurements of CEA, VEGF and bFGF in serum are of limited value in monitoring chemotherapy in ACRC. TPS seems to be of greater interest, but does, not predict exactly which patients are going to have a positive outcome of palliative chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1437
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The utility of tumour markers in assessing the response to chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer
    A M Cook
    R A Huddart
    G Jay
    A Norman
    D P Dearnaley
    A Horwich
    British Journal of Cancer, 2000, 82 : 1952 - 1957
  • [2] The utility of tumour markers in assessing the response to chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer
    Cook, AM
    Huddart, RA
    Jay, G
    Norman, A
    Dearnaley, DP
    Horwich, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 82 (12) : 1952 - 1957
  • [3] The use of tumour markers in assessing response to chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer
    Cook, AM
    Huddart, RA
    Jay, G
    Norman, A
    Dearnaley, DP
    Horwich, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 : 68 - 68
  • [5] Side effects during chemotherapy predict tumour response in advanced colorectal cancer
    B Schuell
    T Gruenberger
    G V Kornek
    N Dworan
    D Depisch
    F Lang
    B Schneeweiss
    W Scheithauer
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 744 - 748
  • [6] Side effects during chemotherapy predict tumour response in advanced colorectal cancer
    Schuell, B
    Gruenberger, T
    Kornek, GV
    Dworan, N
    Depisch, D
    Lang, F
    Schneeweiss, B
    Scheithauer, W
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (07) : 744 - 748
  • [7] A RARE CASE OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED TUMOUR LYSIS SYNDROME IN ADVANCED COLORECTAL CARCINOMA
    Sawhney, Aanchal
    Singhal, Sachi
    Chintagumpala, Venkateswarlu
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 1523A - 1524A
  • [8] Chronomodulated chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma
    Price, T
    Karapetis, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (18) : 3937 - 3938
  • [9] Predictors of chemotherapy response in advanced CRC
    Vessela Vassileva
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2009, 6 (5) : 245 - 245
  • [10] Methylated DNA markers for monitoring palliative chemotherapy response in advanced colorectal cancer.
    Zhu, Mojun
    Mahoney, Douglas W.
    Burger, Kelli
    Foote, Patrick H.
    Doering, Karen A.
    Taylor, William R.
    Then, Sara S.
    Xie, Hao
    Allawi, Hatim T.
    Kaiser, Michael W.
    Lidgard, Graham P.
    Hubbard, Joleen M.
    Kisiel, John B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)