Treatment of adult facial asymmetry with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: Receiver operating characteristic analysis

被引:2
作者
Tseng, Yu-Chuan [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yi-Hsin [3 ]
Pan, Chin-Yun [1 ,2 ]
Chou, Szu-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Ou, Kai-Chieh [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Hong-Po [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Sch Dent, Coll Dent Med, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dent Clin, Dept Orthodont, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Div Stat Anal, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
facial asymmetry; orthodontic therapy; orthognathic surgery; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2013.03.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Not all adult facial asymmetry patients are candidates for surgical correction, therefore patient assessment and selection remain major issues in diagnosis and treatment planning. This study investigated cephalometric variables for distinguishing between adult patients requiring orthognathic surgical versus nonsurgical orthodontic treatment of facial asymmetry. Materials and methods: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess posteroanterior cephalometric measurements. The posteroanterior cephalograms of 60 patients (30 nonsurgical and 30 surgical patients) with facial asymmetry were analyzed, and 51 cephalometric measurements were obtained using computerized cephalometry. Results: Of the 51 measurements, 16 showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Further ROC analysis was used to determine the ability of the 16 cephalometric parameters to distinguish between the two groups of patients. Optimum discriminant effectiveness was obtained from six statistically validated measurements. For a facial asymmetry patient meeting any four of the six measurement criteria, the sensitivity was 60% and the specificity was 90% in determining the need for surgical treatment. The six criteria were mandibular shift angle >4.1 degrees, angle Ra-Me-ANS >= 3.40 degrees, angle Zy-Me-ANS >= 5.30 degrees, angle GWSO-Me-ANS >= 4.90 degrees, angle J-Me-ANS >= 2.10 degrees, and Go(ver)-M-ANS ratio >= 1.11. Conclusion: These six cephalometric measurements constituted the minimum number of discriminators needed to obtain optimal discriminant effectiveness of diagnosis between orthognathic surgical and nonsurgical orthodontic treatment of facial asymmetry. Copyright (C) 2013, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 243
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CONT ORTHODONTICS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WILEY SER PROB STAT
[3]   Hemifacial asymmetry in emotion expressions [J].
Asthana, HS ;
Mandal, MK .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1998, 22 (02) :177-183
[4]  
BISHARA SE, 1994, ANGLE ORTHOD, V64, P89
[5]  
CHOI HY, 1995, KOREAN J ORTHOD, V25, P153
[6]  
DAHLBERG G, 1940, STAT METHODS MED BIO, P100
[7]   Analysis of Facial Skeletal Characteristics in Patients With Chin Deviation [J].
Fong, Jenny Hwai-Jen ;
Wu, Ho-Tai ;
Huang, Ming-Chu ;
Chou, Yu-Wei ;
Chi, Lin-Yang ;
Fong, Yao ;
Kao, Shou-Yen .
JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 73 (01) :29-34
[9]  
Haraguchi S, 2002, ANGLE ORTHOD, V72, P28
[10]   Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients [J].
Haraguchi, Seiji ;
Iguchi, Yoshitaka ;
Takada, Kenji .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (03) :421-426