Deriving a Ranking From Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations Under Group Decision Making

被引:176
作者
Zhu, Bin [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Jiuping [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Uncertainty Decis Making Lab, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Sci, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consistency measure; group decision making (GDM); hesitant fuzzy preference relation (HFPR); hesitant fuzzy set (HFS); BONFERRONI MEANS; SCALING METHOD; CONSISTENCY; MODEL; INFORMATION; SETS; PRIORITIES;
D O I
10.1109/TCYB.2013.2283021
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore the ranking methods with hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) in the group decision making environments. As basic elements of hesitant fuzzy sets, hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs) usually have different numbers of possible values. In order to compute or compare HFEs, we have two principles to normalize them, i. e., the alpha-normalization and the alpha-normalization. Based on the a-normalization, we develop a new hesitant goal programming model to derive priorities from HFPRs. On the basis of the beta-normalization, we develop the consistency measures of HFPRs, establish the consistency thresholds to measure whether or not an HFPR is of acceptable consistency, and then use the hesitant aggregation operators to aggregate preferences in HFPRs to obtain the ranking results.
引用
收藏
页码:1328 / 1337
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The geometric consistency index:: Approximated thresholds [J].
Aguarón, J ;
Moreno-Jiménez, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :137-145
[2]  
[Anonymous], FUZZY SETS SYST
[3]   A hybrid fuzzy logic/constraint satisfaction problem approach to automatic decision making in simulation game models [J].
Braathen, S ;
Sendstad, OJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2004, 34 (04) :1786-1797
[4]   Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 122 (02) :277-291
[5]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[6]   A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO SAATY SCALING METHOD FOR PRIORITIES [J].
DEJONG, P .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 28 (04) :467-478
[7]   On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Xu, Yinfeng ;
Li, Hongyi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 189 (02) :430-444
[8]   An Approach to Solve Group-Decision-Making Problems With Ordinal Interval Numbers [J].
Fan, Zhi-Ping ;
Liu, Yang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2010, 40 (05) :1413-1423
[9]   An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making [J].
Fan, ZP ;
Xiao, SH ;
Hu, GF .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 46 (02) :329-335
[10]   Robust Adaptive Control of MEMS Triaxial Gyroscope Using Fuzzy Compensator [J].
Fei, Juntao ;
Zhou, Jian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2012, 42 (06) :1599-1607