Automated Measurement of Volumetric Mammographic Density: A Tool for Widespread Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

被引:60
作者
Brand, Judith S. [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [1 ]
Shepherd, John A. [1 ,2 ]
Leifland, Karin [3 ]
Heddson, Boel [4 ]
Sundbom, Ann [5 ]
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ]
Li, Jingmei [6 ]
Humphreys, Keith [1 ]
Hall, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] St Gorans Univ Hosp, Unilabs Mammog, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Helsingborg Hosp, Unilabs Mammog, Helsingborg, Sweden
[5] Sodersjukhuset AB, Breast Canc Mammog Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; HERITABILITY; ASSOCIATION; VARIANTS; BENEFITS; ISSUES; WOMEN; FORM; TIME;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1219
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant of screening sensitivity, but its clinical utility is hampered due to the lack of objective and automated measures. We evaluated the performance of a fully automated volumetric method (Volpara). Methods: A prospective cohort study included 41,102 women attending mammography screening, of whom 206 were diagnosed with breast cancer after a median follow-up of 15.2 months. Percent and absolute dense volumes were estimated from raw digital mammograms. Genotyping was performed in a subset of the cohort (N = 2,122). We examined the agreement by side and view and compared density distributions across different mammography systems. We also studied associations with established density determinants and breast cancer risk. Results: The method showed good agreement by side and view, and distributions of percent and absolute dense volume were similar across mammography systems. Volumetric density was positively associated with nulliparity, age at first birth, hormone use, benign breast disease, and family history of breast cancer, and negatively with age and postmenopausal status. Associations were also observed with rs10995190 in the ZNF365 gene (P < 1.0 x 10(-6)) and breast cancer risk [HR for the highest vs. lowest quartile, 2.93;95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.96 and 1.63 (1.10-2.42) for percent and absolute dense volume, respectively]. Conclusions: In a high-throughput setting, Volpara performs well and in accordance with the behavior of established density measures. Impact: Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density is a promising tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. (C) 2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1764 / 1772
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Screen-Film Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: A Comparison of the Volumetric Standard Mammogram Form and the Interactive Threshold Measurement Methods [J].
Aitken, Zoe ;
McCormack, Valerie A. ;
Highnam, Ralph P. ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Gunasekara, Anoma ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Mawdsley, Gord ;
Peressotti, Chris ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (02) :418-428
[2]  
[Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], KAR MAMM PROJ RISK P
[4]   Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density [J].
Assi, Valentina ;
Warwick, Jane ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 9 (01) :33-40
[5]   Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894
[6]   Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes [J].
Boyd, Norman ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Gunasekar, Anoma ;
Melnichouk, Olga ;
Maudsley, Gord ;
Peressotti, Chris ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Minkin, Salomon .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (06) :1754-1762
[7]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[8]   Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years [J].
Buist, DSM ;
Porter, PL ;
Lehman, C ;
Taplin, SH ;
White, E .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (19) :1432-1440
[9]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[10]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629