Are the benefits of export support durable? Evidence from Tunisia

被引:36
作者
Cadot, Olivier [1 ]
Fernandes, Ana M. [2 ]
Gourdon, Julien [3 ]
Mattoo, Aaditya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, CEPR, FERDL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] World Bank, Dev Econ Res Grp, Washington, DC USA
[3] CEPII, Paris, France
关键词
Export promotion; Export margins; Tunisia; Impact evaluation; Propensity-score matching; Matching grant; PROPENSITY SCORE; FIRMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.07.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the effects of the FAMEX export promotion program in Tunisia on the performance of beneficiary firms. While most studies assess only the short-term impact of such programs, we consider also the longer-term impact. Our estimates suggest that the average beneficiary initially saw both higher overall export levels and greater diversification across destinations and products. However, three years after the intervention, beneficiaries' export levels and diversification were no longer significantly different from those of a control group. Furthermore, the effects were heterogeneous across firms: small and large firms saw no positive impact on export levels, and even the positive impact on medium sized firms was temporary. The temporariness of the impact was not due to spillovers to non-beneficiary firms which helped them to catch up, or to greater exposure of beneficiaries to crisis-affected economies. Rather, the impact may be transient because the program did not lead to the enhancements in product quality or sophistication which could have strengthened competitiveness durably. Notwithstanding its transient effect, the relatively low-cost FAMEX still generated two Tunisian Dinars of private profits per Dinar of program expenditure, and the additional corporate tax revenue just covered the public cost of the program. (C) 2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 324
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: A semiparametric approach
    DiNardo, J
    Fortin, NM
    Lemieux, T
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (05) : 1001 - 1044
  • [12] AN ANATOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE: EVIDENCE FROM FRENCH FIRMS
    Eaton, Jonathan
    Kortum, Samuel
    Kramarz, Francis
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2011, 79 (05) : 1453 - 1498
  • [13] Freund C., 2015, REV EC STAT IN PRESS
  • [14] Can Production Subsidies Explain China's Export Performance? Evidence from Firm-level Data
    Girma, Sourafel
    Gong, Yundan
    Goerg, Holger
    Yu, Zhihong
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 111 (04) : 863 - 891
  • [15] Nonexperimental versus experimental estimates of earnings impacts
    Glazerman, S
    Levy, DM
    Myers, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2003, 589 : 63 - 93
  • [16] Grant support and exporting activity
    Goerg, Holger
    Henry, Michael
    Strobl, Eric
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (01) : 168 - 174
  • [17] Gourdon J., 2011, SPEND NEXT MILLION A, P81
  • [18] Economic development as self-discovery
    Hausmann, R
    Rodrik, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2003, 72 (02) : 603 - 633
  • [19] What you export matters
    Hausmann, Ricardo
    Hwang, Jason
    Rodrik, Dani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2007, 12 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [20] Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
    Heckman, JJ
    Ichimura, H
    Todd, PE
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) : 605 - 654