Are the benefits of export support durable? Evidence from Tunisia

被引:36
作者
Cadot, Olivier [1 ]
Fernandes, Ana M. [2 ]
Gourdon, Julien [3 ]
Mattoo, Aaditya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, CEPR, FERDL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] World Bank, Dev Econ Res Grp, Washington, DC USA
[3] CEPII, Paris, France
关键词
Export promotion; Export margins; Tunisia; Impact evaluation; Propensity-score matching; Matching grant; PROPENSITY SCORE; FIRMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.07.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the effects of the FAMEX export promotion program in Tunisia on the performance of beneficiary firms. While most studies assess only the short-term impact of such programs, we consider also the longer-term impact. Our estimates suggest that the average beneficiary initially saw both higher overall export levels and greater diversification across destinations and products. However, three years after the intervention, beneficiaries' export levels and diversification were no longer significantly different from those of a control group. Furthermore, the effects were heterogeneous across firms: small and large firms saw no positive impact on export levels, and even the positive impact on medium sized firms was temporary. The temporariness of the impact was not due to spillovers to non-beneficiary firms which helped them to catch up, or to greater exposure of beneficiaries to crisis-affected economies. Rather, the impact may be transient because the program did not lead to the enhancements in product quality or sophistication which could have strengthened competitiveness durably. Notwithstanding its transient effect, the relatively low-cost FAMEX still generated two Tunisian Dinars of private profits per Dinar of program expenditure, and the additional corporate tax revenue just covered the public cost of the program. (C) 2015 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 324
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior
    Aitken, B
    Hanson, GH
    Harrison, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (1-2) : 103 - 132
  • [2] Alvarez R., 2000, ESTUDIOS EC, V27
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, 4547 WORLD BANK
  • [4] Atkin D., 2015, 20690 NBER
  • [5] Why some firms export
    Bernard, AB
    Jensen, JB
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (02) : 561 - 569
  • [6] Firms in international trade
    Bernard, Andrew B.
    Jensen, J. Bradford
    Redding, Stephen J.
    Schott, Peter K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (03) : 105 - 130
  • [7] Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics
    Blundell, Richard
    Dias, Monica Costa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2009, 44 (03) : 565 - 640
  • [8] Success and failure of African exporters
    Cadot, Olivier
    Iacovone, Leonardo
    Pierola, Martha Denisse
    Rauch, Ferdinand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 101 : 284 - 296
  • [9] Are there lasting impacts of aid to poor areas?
    Chen, Shaohua
    Mu, Ren
    Ravallion, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2009, 93 (3-4) : 512 - 528
  • [10] Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies
    Dehejia, RH
    Wahba, S
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (01) : 151 - 161