Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique

被引:35
作者
Manzotti, Alfonso [1 ]
Cerveri, Pietro [3 ]
Pullen, Chris [2 ]
Confalonieri, Norberto [1 ]
机构
[1] CTO Hosp, Orthoped Dept 1, I-20100 Milan, Italy
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[3] Politecn Milan, Bioengn Dept, I-20100 Milan, Italy
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Computer-assisted; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; MECHANICAL AXIS; LIMB ALIGNMENT; REPLACEMENT; ARTHRITIS; OUTCOMES; IMPLANT; FAILURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-013-2215-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the results of two matched-paired groups of patients who had undergone a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed using either a conventional or a non-image-guided navigation technique specifically designed for unicompartmental prosthesis implantation. Thirty-one patients with isolated medial-compartment knee arthritis who underwent an isolated navigated UKA were included in the study (group A) and matched with patients who had undergone a conventional medial UKA (group B). The same inclusion criteria were used for both groups. At a minimum of six months, all patients were clinically assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) index. Radiographically, the frontal-femoral-component angle, the frontal-tibial-component angle, the hip-knee-ankle angle and the sagittal orientation of components (slopes) were evaluated. Complications related to the implantation technique, length of hospital stay and surgical time were compared. At the latest follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen in the KSS, function scores and WOMAC index between groups. Patients in group B had a statistically significant shorter mean surgical time. Tibial coronal and sagittal alignments were statistically better in the navigated group, with five cases of outliers in the conventional alignment technique group. Postoperative mechanical axis was statistically better aligned in the navigated group, with two cases of overcorrection from varus to valgus in group B. No differences in length of hospital stay or complications related to implantation technique were seen between groups. This study shows that a specifically designed UKA-dedicated navigation system results in better implant alignment in UKA surgery. Whether this improved alignment results in better clinical results in the long term has yet to be proven.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 463
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Ahlbck S., 1968, Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), P7
  • [2] Computer Assisted Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty
    Bae, Dae Kyung
    Song, Sang Jun
    [J]. CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2011, 3 (04) : 259 - 267
  • [3] BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  • [4] Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up
    Berger, RA
    Meneghini, RM
    Jacobs, JJ
    Sheinkop, MB
    Della Valle, CJ
    Rosenberg, AG
    Galante, JO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) : 999 - 1006
  • [5] Navigated shorter incision or Smaller implant in knee arthritis?
    Confalonieri, N.
    Manzotti, A.
    Pullen, C.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (463) : 63 - 67
  • [6] Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty
    Hernigou, P
    Deschamps, G
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (423) : 161 - 165
  • [7] Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Hernigou, P
    Deschamps, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (03) : 506 - 511
  • [8] INSALL JN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P13
  • [9] Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations - A case-controlled comparative study
    Jenny, JY
    Boeri, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (08) : 1016 - 1020
  • [10] John J, 2009, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V75, P45