Reasons for larger warming projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report

被引:1
|
作者
Wigley, TML
Raper, SCB
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Univ E Anglia, Climat Res Unit, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, D-2850 Bremerhaven, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2945:RFLWPI>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Projections of future warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR) are substantially larger than those in the Second Assessment Report (SAR). The reasons for these differences are documented and quantified. Differences are divided into differences in the emissions scenarios and differences in the science (gas cycle, forcing, and climate models). The main source of emissions-related differences in warming is aerosol forcing, primarily due to large differences in SO2 emissions between the SAR and TAR scenarios. For any given emissions scenario, concentration projections based on SAR and TAR science are similar, except for methane at high emissions levels where TAR science leads to substantially lower concentrations. The new (TAR) science leads to slightly lower total forcing and slightly larger warming. At the low end of the warming range the effects of the new science and the new emissions scenarios are roughly equal. At the high end, TAR science has a smaller effect and the main reason for larger TAR warming is the use of a different high-end emissions scenario, primarily changes in SO2 emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:2945 / 2952
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Communications in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report cycle
    Lynn, Jonathan
    Peeva, Nina
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 169 (1-2)
  • [32] Equity assessment of global mitigation pathways in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
    Kanitkar, Tejal
    Mythri, Akhil
    Jayaraman, T.
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024, 24 (08) : 1129 - 1148
  • [33] 'Neutral' Representations of Pacific Islands in the IPCC Special Report of 1.5°C Global Warming
    Germano, Maia
    AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2022, 53 (01) : 23 - 39
  • [34] CLIMATE SCIENCE In New Report, IPCC Gets More Specific About Warming Risks
    Kintisch, Eli
    SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6179) : 21 - 21
  • [35] Reliability of climate models for China through the IPCC Third to Fifth Assessment Reports
    Jiang, Dabang
    Tian, Zhiping
    Lang, Xianmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (03) : 1114 - 1133
  • [36] CLIMATE CHANGE: KEY CONCLUSIONS FROM THE IPCC FOURTH ASSESSMENT REPORT (IPCC-AR4)
    Giorgi, Filippo
    INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR WAR AND PLANETARY EMERGENCIES - 38TH SESSION, 2008, : 101 - 101
  • [37] Working Group 1 report of the IPCC Fourth Assessment - An editorial
    Steffen, Will
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [38] A system-transitions report for the next IPCC assessment cycle
    Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
    Trisos, Christopher
    Mukherji, Aditi
    NATURE, 2023, 624 (7990) : 42 - 42
  • [39] Proleptic Logics in Media Coverage of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
    Mehlenbacher, Ashley Rose
    Eckert, Carolyn
    Doody, Sara
    Forst, Sarah
    Mehlenbacher, Brad
    RHETORIC REVIEW, 2023, 42 (03) : 154 - 168
  • [40] A system-transitions report for the next IPCC assessment cycle
    Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
    Christopher Trisos
    Aditi Mukherji
    Nature, 2023, 624 : 42 - 42