Periacetabular Reconstruction with a New Endoprosthesis

被引:54
作者
Menendez, Lawrence R. [4 ]
Ahlmann, Elke R. [3 ]
Falkinstein, Yuri [2 ]
Allison, Daniel C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Div Musculoskeletal Oncol, Dept Orthoped, Baldwin Pk, CA 91706 USA
[2] Providence St Joseph Med Ctr, Div Spine Surg, Dept Orthoped, Burbank, CA 91505 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles Cty Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles Cty Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Keck Sch Med,USC Univ Hosp, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
SADDLE PROSTHESIS; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION; FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION; RESECTION; COMPLICATIONS; PELVIS; SARCOMA; HEMIPELVECTOMY; ALLOGRAFTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-1043-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Reconstruction of the Type II pelvic resection is challenging. Currently available reconstructive options have inherent problems including graft and implant failure, pain, poor function, and high major complication rates. The periacetabular reconstruction (PAR) endoprosthesis was designed to be secured with internal fixation and bone cement to the remaining ilium and support a reconstructed acetabulum. This construct potentially avoids the complications of graft or hardware failure, while maintaining early mobilization, comfort, limb lengths, and function. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent Type II pelvic resection and reconstruction with the PAR endoprosthesis, analyzing function, complications, and survivorship. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 29.4 months; range, 13 to 108 months). We compared the PAR data with the literature for the Mark II saddle endoprosthesis. The PAR's average MSTS score was 20.8 (67%), major complications occurred in 14 (56%), and implant survivorship was 84% at 2 years and 60% at 5 years. The rate of failure at the ilium-saddle interface was lower and implant survivorship higher than those in the published literature for the Mark II saddle. We recommend use of the PAR endoprosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following Type II pelvic resection. The modified saddle design provides greater inherent stability, allowing for faster rehabilitation and improved longevity without increased complications and is an improvement over the currently available saddle prostheses. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:2831 / 2837
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ABOULAFIA AJ, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P203
[2]   Reconstruction of the hemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours - Complications and functional outcome of prostheses [J].
Abudu, A ;
Grimer, RJ ;
Cannon, SR ;
Carter, SR ;
Sneath, RS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05) :773-779
[3]   Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis [J].
Aljassir, F ;
Beadel, GP ;
Turcotte, RE ;
Griffin, AM ;
Bell, RS ;
Wunder, JS ;
Isler, MH .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (438) :36-41
[4]   Complications and outcome of external hemipelvectomy in the management of pelvic tumors [J].
Apffelstaedt, JP ;
Driscoll, DL ;
Spellman, JE ;
Velez, AF ;
Gibbs, JF ;
Karakousis, CP .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 3 (03) :304-309
[5]   Functional outcomes and quality of life after tumor-related hemipelvectomy [J].
Beck, Lisa A. ;
Einertson, Marlene J. ;
Winemiller, Mark H. ;
DePompolo, Robert W. ;
Hoppe, Kurtis M. ;
Sim, Franklin F. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 88 (08) :916-927
[6]   Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma - Intermediate-term results [J].
Bell, RS ;
Davis, AM ;
Wunder, JS ;
Buconjic, T ;
McGoveran, B ;
Gross, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (11) :1663-1674
[7]  
CAMPANACCI M, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P65
[8]  
CAPANNA R, 1990, Italian Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, V16, P425
[9]   Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors [J].
Cottias, P ;
Jeanrot, C ;
Vinh, TS ;
Tomeno, B ;
Anract, P .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 78 (02) :90-100
[10]  
Delloye C, 2007, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V89A, P579, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.F.00943