The efficacy and safety of leflunomide therapy in lupus nephritis by repeat kidney biopsy

被引:47
|
作者
Zhang, F. S. [2 ]
Nie, Y. K. [2 ]
Jin, X. M. [1 ]
Yu, H. M. [2 ]
Li, Y. N. [2 ]
Sun, Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Harbin 150086, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Rheumatol, Harbin 150086, Peoples R China
关键词
Leflunomide; Lupus nephritis; Kidney biopsy; PREDNISONE; ACTIVATION; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-009-0861-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the clinical and pathological efficacy, and safety of leflunomide as a new immunosuppressive medicine in lupus nephritis (LN). A total of 31 patients were all determined as LN by kidney biopsy. SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), clinical and immunological tests of these patients were performed. Meanwhile, the pathological presentation and LN activity of before and after leflunomide therapy were evaluated by repeat biopsy. The patients of LN usually have a bit response by the first or second month visit and have a good response by the third month visit after leflunomide therapy. One year later SLEDAI scores of all patients were significantly improved and 13 patients of them were transformed from complex pathological types to simple types (the transformed ratio was 41.9%). For the other patients not transformed, the pathological presentation took a favorable turn, the pathological active index (AI) of LN were significantly improved. There was not anyone relapsed or aggravated. The side effects of leflunomide were less and mild, and could be improved by symptomatic management with or without decreasing dosage. The clinical and pathological activity of LN can be apparently inhibited and the relapse can be prevented through leflunomide therapy. The side effects of leflunomide are mild and transient. Leflunomide is now a new ideal immunosuppressive medicine in the therapy of LN.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1335
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repeat Kidney Biopsy in Patients with Lupus Nephritis: Class-Switching and Progression of Chronicity
    Walavalkar, Vighnesh
    Laszik, G. Zoltan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [22] Treat-to-Target in Lupus Nephritis. What is the Role of the Repeat Kidney Biopsy?
    Ioannis Parodis
    Farah Tamirou
    Frédéric A. Houssiau
    Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2022, 70
  • [23] The clinical relevance of a repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis flares
    Daleboudt, Gabrielle M. N.
    Bajema, Ingeborg M.
    Goemaere, Natascha N. T.
    van Laar, Jaap M.
    Bruijn, Jan A.
    Berger, Stefan P.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (12) : 3712 - 3717
  • [24] The Value of Repeat Biopsy in the Management of Lupus Nephritis Flares
    Narvaez, Javier
    Ricse, Milagros
    Goma, Montserrat
    Mitjavila, Francesca
    Fulladosa, Xavier
    Capdevila, Olga
    Torras, Joan
    Juanola, Xavier
    Pujol, Ramon
    Miquel Nolla, Joan
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in induction therapy of patients with lupus nephritis
    Zhou, Tianbiao
    Lin, Shujun
    Yang, Shen
    Lin, Wenshan
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 857 - 869
  • [26] THE VALUE OF REPEAT RENAL BIOPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS
    Alba, P.
    Karim, M. Y.
    Cuadrado, M. J.
    Bento, L.
    Abbs, I. C.
    Tungekar, M. F.
    D'Cruz, D. P.
    Khamashta, M. A.
    Hughes, G. R. V.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 41 : 106 - 106
  • [27] The role of the kidney biopsy in the treatment of lupus nephritis
    Kashgarian, M
    RENAL FAILURE, 1996, 18 (05) : 765 - 773
  • [28] The role of kidney biopsy in the management of lupus nephritis
    Mittal, L
    Rennke, H
    Singh, AK
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2005, 14 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [29] The Kidney Biopsy in Lupus Nephritis: Is It Still Relevant?
    Rovin, Brad H.
    Parikh, Samir V.
    Alvarado, Anthony
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 40 (03) : 537 - +
  • [30] Leflunomide: less toxic than standard therapy for lupus nephritis?
    Negin Nassabeh
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2009, 5 (5) : 240 - 240