Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer

被引:92
作者
Minamimoto, Ryogo [1 ,2 ]
Loening, Andreas [3 ]
Jamali, Mehran [1 ,2 ]
Barkhodari, Amir [1 ]
Mosci, Camila [1 ]
Jackson, Tatianie [1 ]
Obara, Piotr [3 ]
Taviani, Valentina [3 ]
Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam [1 ,2 ]
Vasanawala, Shreyas [3 ]
Iagaru, Andrei [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Mol Imaging Program Stanford, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Radiol Sci Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Tc-99m-MDP; F-18-NaF; F-18-FDG; whole-body MRI; prostate cancer; breast cancer; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; BONE METASTASES; FDG-PET; F-18-FLUORIDE; SPECT; COCKTAIL; SCAN;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.115.162610
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We prospectively evaluated the use of combined F-18-NaF/(18)FFDG PET/CT in patients with breast and prostate cancer and compared the results with those for Tc-99m-MDP bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI. Methods: Thirty patients (15 women with breast cancer and 15 men with prostate cancer) referred for standard-of-care bone scintigraphy were prospectively enrolled in this study. F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI were performed after bone scintigraphy. The whole-body MRI protocol consisted of both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sequences. Lesions detected with each test were tabulated, and the results were compared. Results: For extraskeletal lesions, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI had no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (92.9% vs. 92.9%, P = 1.00), positive predictive value (81.3% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.68), or accuracy (76.5% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.56). However, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (96.2% vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.01) and bone scintigraphy (96.2% vs. 64.6%, P < 0.001, 89.8% vs. 65.9%, P < 0.001) for the detection of skeletal lesions. Overall, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than whole-body MRI (95.7% vs. 83.3%, P < 0.002, 87.6% vs. 76.0%, P < 0.02) but not statistically significantly so when compared with a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy (95.7% vs. 91.6%, P 5 0.17, 87.6% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.53). F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT showed no significant difference from a combination of F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI. No statistically significant differences in positive predictive value were noted among the 3 examinations. Conclusion: F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT is superior to whole-body MRI and Tc-99m-MDP scintigraphy for evaluation of skeletal disease extent. Further, F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI detected extraskeletal disease that may change the management of these patients. F-18-NaF/F-18-FDG PET/CT provides diagnostic ability similar to that of a combination of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast and prostate cancer. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these preliminary findings, ideally using the newly introduced simultaneous PET/MRI scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:1862 / 1868
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? [J].
Antoch, Gerald ;
Bockisch, Andreas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 :113-120
[2]   Breast Cancer: Role of SPECT and PET in Imaging Bone Metastases [J].
Ben-Haim, Simona ;
Israel, Ora .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (06) :408-415
[3]   Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer [J].
Dirisamer, Albert ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Floery, Daniel ;
Wolf, Florian ;
Beheshti, Mohsen ;
Mayerhoefer, Marius E. ;
Langsteger, Werner .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (02) :294-299
[4]   Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer [J].
Eubank, WB ;
Mankoff, D ;
Bhattacharya, M ;
Gralow, J ;
Linden, H ;
Ellis, G ;
Lindsley, S ;
Austin-Seymour, M ;
Livingston, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) :479-486
[5]  
Even-Sapir E, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P287
[6]   Breast Cancer Version 2.2015 [J].
Gradishar, William J. ;
Anderson, Benjamin O. ;
Balassanian, Ron ;
Blair, Sarah L. ;
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Cyr, Amy ;
Elias, Anthony D. ;
Farrar, William B. ;
Forero, Andres ;
Giordano, Sharon Hermes ;
Goetz, Matthew ;
Goldstein, Lori J. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Isakoff, Steven J. ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Mayer, Ingrid A. ;
McCormick, Beryl ;
Moran, Meena ;
Patel, Sameer A. ;
Pierce, Lori J. ;
Reed, Elizabeth C. ;
Salerno, Kilian E. ;
Schwartzberg, Lee S. ;
Smith, Karen Lisa ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Soliman, Hatem ;
Somlo, George ;
Telli, Melinda ;
Ward, John H. ;
Shead, Dorothy A. ;
Kumar, Rashmi .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (04) :448-475
[7]   Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging [J].
Heusner, Till-Alexander ;
Kuemmel, Sherko ;
Koeninger, Angela ;
Hamami, Monia E. ;
Hahn, Steffen ;
Quinsten, Anton ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Forsting, Michael ;
Lauenstein, Thomas ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Stahl, Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (06) :1077-1086
[8]   Characterization of osteolytic, osteoblastic, and mixed lesions in a prostate cancer mouse model using 18F-FDG and 18F-fluoride PET/CT [J].
Hsu, Wellington K. ;
Virk, Mandeep S. ;
Feeley, Brian T. ;
Stout, David B. ;
Chatziioannou, Arion E. ;
Lieberman, Jay R. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 49 (03) :414-421
[9]  
Iagaru A, 2015, CLIN NUCL MED, V40, P1, DOI 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000611
[10]  
Iagaru A, 2013, J NUCL MED, V54, P176, DOI 10.2967/jnumed.112.108803