Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019

被引:294
作者
Perkmann, Markus [1 ]
Salandra, Rossella [2 ]
Tartari, Valentina [3 ]
McKelvey, Maureen [4 ]
Hughes, Alan [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll, Business Sch, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Claverton Rd, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Strategy & Innovat, Kilevej 14A, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Business Law & Econ, Dept Econ & Soc, Inst Innovat & Entrepreneurship, POB 610, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Lancaster, Management Sch, Lancaster W7LA1 4YX, England
关键词
University-industry relations; Technology transfer; Academic entrepreneurship; Commercialisation; Collaborative research; Academic consulting; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGES; OPEN SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE EVIDENCE; PUBLIC RESEARCH; RESEARCH IMPACT; SCIENTISTS; COLLABORATION; COMMERCIALIZATION; RESEARCHERS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We provide a systematic review of the literature on academic engagement from 2011 onwards, which was the cut-off year of a previous review article published in Research Policy. Academic engagement refers to knowledge-related interactions of academic scientists with external organisations. It includes activities such as collaborative research with industry, contract research, consulting and informal ties. We consolidate what is known about the individual, organisational and institutional antecedents of academic engagement, and its consequences for research, commercialisation, and society at large. Our results suggest that individual characteristics associated with academic engagement include being scientifically productive, senior, male, locally trained, and commercially experienced. Academic engagement is also socially conditioned by peer effects and disciplinary characteristics. In terms of consequences, academic engagement is positively associated with academics' subsequent scientific productivity. We propose new areas of investigation where evidence remains inconclusive, including individual life cycle effects, the role of organisational contexts and incentives, cross-national comparisons, and the impact of academic engagement on the quality of subsequent research as well as the educational, commercial and society-wide impact.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship [J].
Abreu, Maria ;
Grinevich, Vadim .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2017, 42 (04) :763-794
[2]   The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities [J].
Abreu, Maria ;
Grinevich, Vadim .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (02) :408-422
[3]   Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit [J].
Ankrah, S. N. ;
Burgess, T. F. ;
Grimshaw, P. ;
Shaw, N. E. .
TECHNOVATION, 2013, 33 (2-3) :50-65
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, V3rd
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HIST U EUROPE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EC SOC ENV IMP COOP
[7]   Personal ties in university-industry linkages: a case-study from Argentina [J].
Arza, Valeria ;
Carattoli, Mariela .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2017, 42 (04) :814-840
[8]   Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology [J].
Aschhoff, Birgit ;
Grimpe, Christoph .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (02) :367-381
[9]  
Baaken T, 2018, STATE U BUSINESS COO
[10]   The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK [J].
Banal-Estanol, Albert ;
Jofre-Bonet, Mireia ;
Lawson, Cornelia .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (06) :1160-1175