Digestion Performance and Microbial Metabolic Mechanism in Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters Exposed to Elevated Loadings of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste

被引:17
作者
Gao, Yiming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kong, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xing, Tao [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Yongming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yi [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Luo, Xingjian [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sun, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] CAS Key Lab Renewable Energy, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Key Lab New & Renewable Energy Res, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
anaerobic digestion; organic fraction of municipal solid waste; microbial mechanisms; metabolism analysis; SP NOV; GEN; NOV; INHIBITION; PRETREATMENT; CONVERSION; METHANE; PLANT;
D O I
10.3390/en11040952
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion reactors (MR and TR) for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) were tested to reveal the differential microbial responses to increasing organic loading rate (OLR). MR exhibited faster adaptation and better performance at an OLR range of 1.0-2.5g VS.L-1.d(-1), with average profiles of a biogas yield of 0.38 L/gVS(added)*d at 0.5 g/ L*d OLR and 0.69 L/gVS(added)*d at 2.5 g/ L*d OLR, whereas TR had a biogas yield of 0.07 L/gVS(added)*d at 0.5 g/ L*d OLR and 0.44 L/gVS(added)*d at 2.5 g/ L*d OLR. The pyrosequencing results of amplicons revealed the microbial mechanisms of OFMSW anaerobic digestion. Larger shifts in the bacteria composition were observed in the TR with OLR elevation. For methanogens in both reactors, Methanothrix dominated in the MR while Methanosarcina was favored in the TR. Moreover, analysis of the mode and efficiency of metabolism between the MR and TR demonstrated different performances with more efficiency related to the limiting hydrolytic acid step.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters [J].
Nelson, Michael C. ;
Morrison, Mark ;
Yu, Zhongtang .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (04) :3730-3739
[22]   EFFECTS OF PH ON SULFIDE TOXICITY TO ANAEROBIC PROCESSES [J].
OLESZKIEWICZ, JA ;
MARSTALLER, T ;
MCCARTNEY, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1989, 10 (09) :815-822
[23]   Analysis of the extrusion as a pretreatment for the anaerobic digestion process [J].
Panepinto, Deborah ;
Genon, Giuseppe .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2016, 83 :206-212
[24]  
Patel B., 2018, MICROB ECOL, V75, P113
[25]  
POGGIVARALDO HM, 1991, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V52, P135
[26]  
RIPLEY LE, 1986, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V58, P406
[27]   Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge [J].
Riviere, Delphine ;
Desvignes, Virginie ;
Pelletier, Eric ;
Chaussonnerie, Sebastien ;
Guermazi, Sonda ;
Weissenbach, Jean ;
Li, Tianlun ;
Camacho, Patricia ;
Sghir, Abdelghani .
ISME JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (06) :700-714
[28]   Evaluating inhibition conditions in high-solids anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste [J].
Schievano, Andrea ;
D'Imporzano, Giuliana ;
Malagutti, Luca ;
Fragali, Emilio ;
Ruboni, Gabriella ;
Adani, Fabrizio .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (14) :5728-5732
[29]   Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge [J].
Song, YC ;
Kwon, SJ ;
Woo, JH .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (07) :1653-1662
[30]   Mariniphaga sediminis sp nov., isolated from coastal sediment [J].
Wang, Feng-Qing ;
Shen, Qi-Yao ;
Chen, Guan-Jun ;
Du, Zong-Jun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 65 :2908-2912