Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock-aftershock sequences

被引:70
作者
Han, Ruilong [1 ]
Li, Yue [1 ]
van de Lindt, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Seismic risk; Non-ductile RC frame building; Base isolation; Aftershocks; Lead rubber bearings; Uncertainty; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY; EARTHQUAKE; FRAGILITY; BRIDGES; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.010
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Base isolation is a promising approach to retrofit seismically vulnerable buildings, but the supporting body of research on seismic risk mitigation through base isolation, particularly considering the associated uncertainties and mainshock-aftershock sequences, is deficient. Therefore, in this study seismic risk analysis was performed for an old non-ductile RC frame building before and after retrofit with base isolation. Various sources of uncertainty such as structural uncertainties, ground motions uncertainties and modeling uncertainties are discussed and propagated in the analysis procedure. A sensitivity study was also conducted to determine which structural parameters have the most significant impact on both the seismic demands of the un-retrofitted and base isolated building. A suite of recorded mainshock and aftershock ground motions was utilized to investigate the influence of considering aftershocks on the performance of these types of buildings. The study revealed that base isolation can greatly reduce the seismic risk Tor higher damage levels, as one would expect. More importantly, the results also indicated that neglecting aftershocks can cause considerable underestimation of the seismic risk. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 56
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Ang A.H.-S., 2007, Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, VI
[2]  
[Anonymous], ASCE41
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FEMA350
[4]   Probability-based seismic response analysis [J].
Aslani, H ;
Miranda, E .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (08) :1151-1163
[5]   Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames - Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties [J].
Celik, Ozan Cem ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (01) :1-12
[6]   Seismic Risk Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Mid-America Ground Motions [J].
Celik, Ozan Cem ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (04) :414-424
[7]   Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones [J].
Choi, ES ;
DesRoches, R ;
Nielson, B .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (02) :187-199
[8]  
Constantinou M. C., 2011, MCEER110004
[9]  
Constantinou MC, 2007, Report No. MCEER-07-0012
[10]   Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines [J].
Cornell, CA ;
Jalayer, F ;
Hamburger, RO ;
Foutch, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (04) :526-533