Emergency and Prophylactic Use of Miniaturized Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

被引:57
作者
Husser, Oliver [1 ]
Holzamer, Andreas [2 ]
Philipp, Alois [2 ]
Nunez, Julio [1 ]
Bodi, Vicente [1 ]
Mueller, Thomas [1 ]
Lubnow, Matthias [1 ]
Luchner, Andreas [1 ]
Lunz, Dirk [3 ]
Riegger, Guenter A. J. [1 ]
Schmid, Christof [2 ]
Hengstenberg, Christian [1 ,4 ]
Hilker, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Klin & Poliklin Innere Med 2, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Klin Herz Thorax & Herznahe Gefasschirurg, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Regensburg, Med Ctr, Anasthesiol Klin, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[4] German Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, D-80636 Munich, Germany
关键词
transcatheter aortic valve implantation; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; emergency; prophylactic; procedural complications; MULTICENTER; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.24806
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo report our center's experience using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BackgroundIn TAVI, short-term mortality closely relates to life threatening procedural complications. VaECMO can be used to stabilize the patient in emergency situations. However, for the prophylactic use of vaECMO in very high-risk patients undergoing TAVI there is no experience. MethodsFrom January 2009 to August 2011, we performed 131 TAVI. Emergency vaECMO was required in 8 cases (7%): ventricular perforation (n=3), hemodynamic instability/cardiogenic shock (n=4), hemodynamic deterioration due to ventricular tachycardia (n=1). Since August 2011, during 83 procedures, prophylactic vaECMO was systematically used in very high-risk patients (n=9, 11%) and emergency ECMO in one case (1%) due to ventricular perforation. ResultsMedian logistic EuroScore in prophylactic vaECMO patients was considerably higher as compared to the remaining TAVI population (30% vs. 15%, P=0.0003) while in patients with emergency vaECMO it was comparable (18% vs. 15%, P=0.08). Comparing prophylactic to emergency vaECMO, procedural success and 30-day mortality were 100% vs. 44% (P=0.03) and 0% vs. 44% (P=0.02), respectively. Major vascular complications and rate of life threatening bleeding did not differ between both groups (11% vs. 11%, P=0.99 and 11% vs. 33%, P=0.3) and were not vaECMO-related. ConclusionsLife-threatening complications during TAVI can be managed using emergency vaECMO but mortality remains high. The use of prophylactic vaECMO in very high-risk patients is safe and may be advocated in selected cases. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:E542 / E551
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[11]   Incidence and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 663 Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis [J].
Tamburino, Corrado ;
Capodanno, Davide ;
Ramondo, Angelo ;
Petronio, Anna Sonia ;
Ettori, Federica ;
Santoro, Gennaro ;
Klugmann, Silvio ;
Bedogni, Francesco ;
Maisano, Francesco ;
Marzocchi, Antonio ;
Poli, Arnaldo ;
Antoniucci, David ;
Napodano, Massimo ;
De Carlo, Marco ;
Fiorina, Claudia ;
Ussia, Gian Paolo .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (03) :299-308
[12]   Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry [J].
Zahn, Ralf ;
Gerckens, Ulrich ;
Grube, Eberhard ;
Linke, Axel ;
Sievert, Horst ;
Eggebrecht, Holger ;
Hambrecht, Rainer ;
Sack, Stefan ;
Hauptmann, Karl Eugen ;
Richardt, Gert ;
Figulla, Hans-Reiner ;
Senges, Jochen .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (02) :198-204