A randomised double-blinded controlled trial of the effect of diluent volume on the efficacy of a single dose of epidural ropivacaine for labour analgesia

被引:10
作者
Chan, L. [1 ]
Lee, B. B. [1 ]
Kee, W. D. Ngan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
epidural analgesia; labour; local anaesthetics; ropivacaine;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.11.001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Few studies have systematically investigated the effect of diluent volume on the efficacy of epidural local anaesthetics for labour analgesia and no data are available for ropivacaine. Our aim was to compare epidural ropivacaine given in three different volumes for labour analgesia. Methods: In a double-blinded study, we randomly assigned 60 labouring parturients with cervical dilatation <5 cm to receive epidural ropivacaine 30 mg diluted to 5 mL (group 5, n = 20), 10 mL (group 10, n = 20) or 20 mL (group 20, n = 20) for analgesia. We measured visual analogue scale pain scores at the peak of contraction for 30 min plus onset and duration of analgesia. Results: Pain scores at 30 min were similar among group 5 (median 22 [interquartile range 0-44] mm), group 10 (9 [0-21] mm) and group 20 (37 [0-51] mm), P = 0.35. The number of patients who achieved a decrease in pain score to <= 30% of baseline was similar among group 5 (12/20 (60%)), group 10 (17/20 (85%)) and group 20 (11/19 (58%)), P = 0.13. Onset and duration of analgesia, the incidence of motor block and patient satisfaction were similar among groups. Conclusions: Under the conditions of this study, within the range of 5-20 mL, the volume and concentration were not significant factors influencing the efficacy of a single 30-mg bolus of epidural ropivacaine given for labour analgesia. This suggests that the most important factor influencing analgesic efficacy was drug mass. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations in patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: A volume-range study [J].
Bernard, JM ;
Le Roux, D ;
Frouin, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (06) :1800-1807
[2]   Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Fusco, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (01) :11-13
[3]   Effects of diluent volume of a single dose of epidural bupivacaine in parturients during the first stage of labor [J].
Christiaens, F ;
Verborgh, C ;
Dierick, A ;
Camu, F .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (02) :134-141
[4]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[5]   Dose-response study of epidural ropivacaine for labor analgesia [J].
Lee, BB ;
Kee, WDN ;
Wong, ELY ;
Liu, JYW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (05) :767-772
[6]  
MacArthur C, 2001, LANCET, V358, P19
[7]   ANALYSIS OF SERIAL MEASUREMENTS IN MEDICAL-RESEARCH [J].
MATTHEWS, JNS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
CAMPBELL, MJ ;
ROYSTON, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6719) :230-235
[8]   Double-blind comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25%, for the relief of childbirth pain [J].
Muir, HA ;
Writer, D ;
Douglas, J ;
Weeks, S ;
Gambling, D ;
Macarthur, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (06) :599-604
[9]   Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery after epidural analgesia for labour with ropivacaine and bupivacaine: a prospective meta-analysis [J].
Writer, WDR ;
Stienstra, R ;
Eddleston, JM ;
Gatt, SP ;
Griffin, R ;
Gutsche, BB ;
Joyce, TH ;
Hedlund, C ;
Heeroma, K ;
Selander, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 81 (05) :713-717
[10]  
YARNELL RW, 1990, REGION ANESTH, V15, P275