A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Trait Cognitive Self-Report Measures in Social Anxiety

被引:7
作者
Stein, Jo-Elle [1 ]
Modini, Matthew [1 ]
Hunt, Caroline [1 ]
Abbott, Maree J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, M02F,94 Mallett St, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
关键词
Social anxiety; Social phobia; Systematic review; Psychometric; Measures; Questionnaires; Cognitive; Self-report; NEGATIVE-EVALUATION-SCALE; BRIEF-FEAR; POSITIVE EVALUATION; BELIEFS SCALE; POSTEVENT RUMINATION; ATTENTIONAL BIASES; STATEMENT TEST; PHOBIA; DISORDER; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-016-9573-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Cognitive factors, including beliefs, thoughts and assumptions have been found to play an important role in the development and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder. Trait cognitive self-report measures of social anxiety are widely used in research and clinical settings. It is imperative that only measures with good psychometric properties are used in order to interpret assessment scores accurately, and to make valid and reliable conclusions. The present systematic review evaluated the psychometric properties of trait cognitive self-report measures of social anxiety. Relevant studies were identified via a comprehensive and systematic search of academic databases. The reported psychometric properties of included studies were analysed by applying an appraisal of adequacy tool developed by Terwee et al. (2007). Of the 3091 studies identified, 50 studies met the inclusion criteria, and they included 21 measures. Included studies demonstrated that a number of measures had some adequate psychometric properties, however, no measure fulfilled criteria for all psychometric properties according to the appraisal tool. Findings highlight the need to further establish the psychometric properties of cognitive self-report measures of social anxiety in clinical and research settings through additional empirical studies.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:17
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Post-event rumination and negative self-appraisal in social phobia before and after treatment [J].
Abbott, MJ ;
Rapee, RM .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 113 (01) :136-144
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association A. Association A.P, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053]
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT J EATING DISORDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SOCIAL PHOBIA DIAGNO
[5]   The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders - General emotionality or disorder specificity? [J].
Becker, ES ;
Rinck, M ;
Margraf, J ;
Roth, WT .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2001, 15 (03) :147-159
[6]   Incidence of social anxiety disorder and the consistent risk for secondary depression in the first three decades of life [J].
Beesdo, Katja ;
Bittner, Antje ;
Pine, Daniel S. ;
Stein, Murray B. ;
Hoefler, Michael ;
Lieb, Roselind ;
Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 64 (08) :903-912
[7]  
BOYCE P, 1989, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V23, P341
[8]   An analysis of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder [J].
Brozovich, Faith ;
Heimberg, Richard G. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 28 (06) :891-903
[9]   Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: Construct validity of the BFNE-II (vol 21, pg 131, 2007) [J].
Carleton, R. Nicholas ;
Collimore, Kelsey C. ;
Asmundson, Gordon J. G. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2007, 21 (04) :600-601
[10]   Brief fear of negative evaluation scale - Revised [J].
Carleton, R. Nicholas ;
McCreary, Donald R. ;
Norton, Peter J. ;
Asmundson, Gordon J. G. .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2006, 23 (05) :297-303