Accounting standards and the economics of standards

被引:39
作者
Meeks, Geoff [2 ]
Swann, G. M. Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Judge Sch Business, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
关键词
international accounting regulation; economics of standards; PERFORMANCE; MARKET; COST; COMPATIBILITY; LEMONS;
D O I
10.1080/00014788.2009.9663360
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The paper draws on the economics of standards to inform current debates on international accounting standards. It traces the benefits claimed for standards - their contribution to the division of labour, innovation, trust, etc.; and the costs, including entry barriers and compliance costs. It illustrates these benefits and costs with cases from accounting regulation. It adopts two approaches to the question whether accounting regulation is best achieved by a single set of standards for the world, or by competing systems. The first approach focuses on contributions in economics, including the theory of standards races and of optimal variety. In these analyses, only in special circumstances has a single standard emerged as the superior outcome. The second approach introduces evidence from accounting and finance on the problems of translation with globalised financial markets, and on the relative costs and benefits of multiple standard-setters or a single global scheme. The most compelling net benefits of harmonisation arise for small economies moving from idiosyncratic to international standards.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 210
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   THE ACQUIRING OF THE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT STANDARDS IN THE DIGITAL ERA [J].
Mijatovic, Ivana ;
Tasic, Biljana ;
Jovanovic, Milan .
AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2019, 21 (51) :427-441
[42]   The risk of standards proliferation - An analysis of differences between private and public transport standards [J].
Urciuoli, Luca .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 116 :591-602
[43]   Transnational multi-stakeholder sustainability standards and biofuels: understanding standards processes [J].
Fortin, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2013, 40 (03) :563-587
[44]   Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective? [J].
Tipton, M. J. ;
Milligan, G. S. ;
Reilly, T. J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 113 (10) :2435-2446
[45]   Process Model for e-Business Standards Development: A Case of ebXML Standards [J].
Choi, Beomjin ;
Raghu, T. S. ;
Vinze, Ajay ;
Dooley, Kevin J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2009, 56 (03) :448-467
[46]   Barriers to domestic retrofit quality: Are failures in retrofit standards a failure of retrofit standards? [J].
Fylan, Fiona ;
Glew, David .
INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) :710-718
[47]   Enforcement of Accounting Standards in Europe: Capital-Market-Based Evidence for the Two-Tier Mechanism in Germany [J].
Hitz, Joerg-Markus ;
Ernstberger, Juergen ;
Stich, Michael .
EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 21 (02) :253-281
[48]   Are food safety standards different from other food standards? A political economy perspective [J].
Swinnen, Johan F. M. ;
Vandemoortele, Thijs .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 36 (04) :507-523
[49]   Varying Teacher Expectations and Standards: Curriculum Differentiation in the Age of Standards-Based Reform [J].
Harris, Donna M. .
EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY, 2012, 44 (02) :128-150
[50]   TO REBATE OR NOT TO REBATE: FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS VERSUS FEEBATES [J].
Durrmeyer, Isis ;
Samano, Mario .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2018, 128 (616) :3076-3116