Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision

被引:14
作者
Jiang, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, Bingqing [2 ]
Li, Yongcheng [3 ]
Qi, Dunfeng [4 ]
Wang, Daxing [5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin First Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Tianjin 300192, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Second Peoples Hosp, Dept Surg, Tianjin 300192, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Affiliated Xuzhou Hosp,Med Coll, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Hepat Biliary Pancreat Splen Surg, Affiliated Xuzhou Hosp,Med Coll, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Peoples Hosp Huaiyin Jinan, Dept Gen Surg, Jinan 250021, Peoples R China
关键词
Gallbladder carcinoma; SEER; Overall survival; AJCC; Stage; Prognosis; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-020-07578-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) came into force since 2018. However, the prognostic precision of this staging system has not been properly assessed. This study aimed to evaluate the latest staging system and suggest modifications to improve its prognostic precision.MethodsData of patients with GBC was included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015) and multicenter database (2010-2017). Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded including age, sex, race, grade, T category, N category, M category and stage. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival functions. The prediction power of the AJCC 8th edition and its modified version were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index).ResultsA total of 2779 GBC patients were included in the SEER database and 591 were collected from multicenter database. While no significant difference in survival of patients was observed between stages IVA and IVB using the 8th AJCC staging system (p>0.05), the prognosis of stage IIIA showed a slightly better outcome than stage IIIB (p=0.046) in the SEER database. In the multicenter database, there was no significant difference between stage IIIA and stage IIIB (p>0.05). Similarly, no significant difference in the survival of patients between stages IIIA and IIIB was observed when M0 patients with at least 6 lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed (p>0.05) for both SEER and multicenter database. On the other hand, a modified staging system was able to stratify patients from stage IIIA, stage IIIB and stage IV (p<0.001). For the SEER database, the C-indexes of 8th AJCC staging system and that of its modified version were 0.709 and 0.742, respectively. For the multicenter database, the C-index of 8th AJCC staging system and that of our modified version were 0.635 and 0.679, respectively.ConclusionsThe modified 8th staging system proposed in this study can improve the prognostic precision of the 8th AJCC staging system for GBC. We therefore suggest including these modifications in the next update of AJCC staging system for GBC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Staging and prognosis of oropharyngeal carcinoma according to the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual in human papillomavirus infection
    Yamashita, Yukashi
    Ikegami, Taro
    Hirakawa, Hitoshi
    Uehara, Takayuki
    Deng, Zeyi
    Agena, Shinya
    Uezato, Jin
    Kondo, Shunsuke
    Kiyuna, Asanori
    Maeda, Hiroyuki
    Suzuki, Mikio
    Ganaha, Akira
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (03) : 827 - 836
  • [22] Independent Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Prostate Cancer Staging Classification
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Mason, Ross J.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Frank, Igor
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (06) : 1287 - 1295
  • [23] Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system for gallbladder cancer and its lymphadenectomy guidelines
    Lee, Andrew J.
    Chiang, Yi-Ju
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Conrad, Claudius
    Chun, Yun-Shin
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 230 : 148 - 154
  • [24] Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Bagante, Fabio
    Weiss, Matthew
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Marques, Hugo P.
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Pulitano, Carlo
    Bauer, Todd W.
    Shen, Feng
    Poultsides, George A.
    Soubrane, Oliver
    Martel, Guillaume
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Itaru, Endo
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 115 (06) : 696 - 703
  • [25] Stage Ⅲ should be subclassified into Stage ⅢA and ⅢB in the American Joint Committee on Cancer(8th Edition) staging system for pancreatic cancer
    Hai-Feng Yu
    Bing-Qing Zhao
    Yong-Cheng Li
    Jun Fu
    Wei Jiang
    Rong-Wei Xu
    Hao-Chang Yang
    Xiao-Jun Zhang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2018, 24 (22) : 2400 - 2405
  • [26] The predictive value of the prognostic staging system in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER population-based analysis
    Liu, Ying-Ying
    Yu, Tian-Jian
    Liu, Guang-Yu
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [27] Validation and proposed modification of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for patients with esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms: Evaluation of a revised lymph node classification
    Wang, Haihong
    Chen, Yaobing
    Pi, Guoliang
    Zhu, Ying
    Yang, Shengli
    Mei, Hong
    Lin, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Tao
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 19 (06) : 4122 - 4132
  • [28] Using The Cancer Genome Atlas data to refine the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for papillary thyroid carcinoma
    Anello Marcello Poma
    Elisabetta Macerola
    Liborio Torregrossa
    Rossella Elisei
    Ferruccio Santini
    Fulvio Basolo
    Endocrine, 2021, 72 : 140 - 146
  • [29] Using The Cancer Genome Atlas data to refine the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for papillary thyroid carcinoma
    Poma, Anello Marcello
    Macerola, Elisabetta
    Torregrossa, Liborio
    Elisei, Rossella
    Santini, Ferruccio
    Basolo, Fulvio
    ENDOCRINE, 2021, 72 (01) : 140 - 146
  • [30] Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort
    Kwon, Wooil
    He, Jin
    Higuchi, Ryota
    Son, Donghee
    Lee, Seung Yeoun
    Kim, Jaeri
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Cameron, John L.
    Yamamoto, Masakazu
    Jang, Jin-Young
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (09) : 418 - 427