Multi-model integrated error correction for streamflow simulation based on Bayesian model averaging and dynamic system response curve

被引:11
作者
Wang, Jian [1 ]
Bao, Weimin [1 ]
Xiao, Zhangling [1 ]
Si, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Error correction method; Streamflow modeling; Bayesian model averaging; Dynamic system response curve; MIXED RUNOFF MODEL; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; DATA ASSIMILATION; FLOOD; ACCURACY; UNCERTAINTY; COMBINATION; PREDICTION; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127518
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Error correction methods play an important role in improving the reliability and accuracy of hydrological modeling. The Dynamic system response curve (DSRC) is a novel and effective error correction method, but it may have the problem of over-correction. Therefore, two multi-model integrated error correction models based on DSRC and Bayesian model averaging (BMA) were proposed in this paper, namely DSRC-BMA and BMA-DSRC. The Sunshui River catchment is selected for a case study. First, three hydrological models including Xinanjiang model (XAJ), Hydrologiska Fyrans Vattenbalans modell (HBV) and vertically hybrid yield model (VHY) were employed. Then, a standard BMA model and three DSRC-based models were constructed separately. Finally, two multi-model integrated error correction models (DSRC-BMA and BMA-DSRC) were applied. The performance of these nine models was compared by Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (NSE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and percent bias (PBIAS). Results showed that the DSRC-based models presented better results than the standard BMA method and most DSRC-based models. Moreover, the uncertainty in BMA, DSRC-BMA and BMA-DSRC models were assessed. The 90% confidence interval of the BMA-DSRC model had high containing ratio values and low average relative bandwidth. Overall, the proposed multi-model integrated error correction methods are effective and can be applicable in improving streamflow modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A comparative analysis of 9 multi-model averaging approaches in hydrological continuous streamflow simulation [J].
Arsenault, Richard ;
Gatien, Philippe ;
Renaud, Benoit ;
Brissette, Francois ;
Martel, Jean-Luc .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 :754-767
[2]   Neural networks as routine for error updating of numerical models [J].
Babovic, V ;
Canizares, R ;
Jensen, HR ;
Klinting, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (03) :181-193
[3]  
Bao W., 1997, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V3, P18
[4]   Flow Updating in Real-Time Flood Forecasting Based on Runoff Correction by a Dynamic System Response Curve [J].
Bao Weimin ;
Si Wei ;
Qu Simin .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (04) :747-756
[5]   Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters [J].
Bardossy, A. ;
Singh, S. K. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (06) :1273-1283
[6]   Ensemble-based data assimilation for operational flood forecasting - On the merits of state estimation for 1D hydrodynamic forecasting through the example of the "Adour Maritime" river [J].
Barthelemy, S. ;
Ricci, S. ;
Rochoux, M. C. ;
Le Pape, E. ;
Thual, O. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 552 :210-224
[7]  
Bergstrom S., 1973, NORD HYDROL, V4, P147, DOI DOI 10.2166/NH.1973.0012
[8]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[9]   An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation [J].
Butts, MB ;
Payne, JT ;
Kristensen, M ;
Madsen, H .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) :242-266
[10]   Hydrological data assimilation with the Ensemble Square-Root-Filter: Use of streamflow observations to update model states for real-time flash flood forecasting [J].
Chen, He ;
Yang, Dawen ;
Hong, Yang ;
Gourley, Jonathan J. ;
Zhang, Yu .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2013, 59 :209-220