How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects

被引:126
作者
Morandi, Bertrand [1 ]
Piegay, Herve [1 ]
Lamouroux, Nicolas [2 ]
Vaudor, Lise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, ENS Lyon, UMR EVS CNRS 5600, F-69007 Lyon, France
[2] IRSTEA, UR MALY, F-69626 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
River restoration; Evaluation; Monitoring; Public policy; Social values; France; STREAM RESTORATION; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; RHONE RIVER; ENHANCEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; STRATEGY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, French operational managers and scientists have been involved in the environmental restoration of rivers. The European Water Framework Directive (2000) highlights the need for feedback from restoration projects and for evidence-based evaluation of success. Based on 44 French pilot projects that included such an evaluation, the present study includes: 1) an introduction to restoration projects based on their general characteristics 2) a description of evaluation strategies and authorities in charge of their implementation, and 3) a focus on the evaluation of results and the links between these results and evaluation strategies. The results show that: 1) the quality of an evaluation strategy often remains too poor to understand well the link between a restoration project and ecological changes; 2) in many cases, the conclusions drawn are contradictory, making it difficult to determine the success or failure of a restoration project; and 3) the projects with the poorest evaluation strategies generally have the most positive conclusions about the effects of restoration. Recommendations are that evaluation strategies should be designed early in the project planning process and be based on clearly-defined objectives. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 188
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Ecological success in stream restoration: Case studies from the midwestern United States [J].
Alexander, Gretchen G. ;
Allan, J. David .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 40 (02) :245-255
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SAGE ENCY SOCIAL SCI
[3]   Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? [J].
Bash, JS ;
Ryan, CM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (06) :877-885
[4]   Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners [J].
Bernhardt, Emily S. ;
Sudduth, Elizabeth B. ;
Palmer, Margaret A. ;
Allan, J. David ;
Meyer, Judy L. ;
Alexander, Gretchen ;
Follastad-Shah, Jennifer ;
Hassett, Brooke ;
Jenkinson, Robin ;
Lave, Rebecca ;
Rumps, Jeanne ;
Pagano, Laura .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2007, 15 (03) :482-493
[5]   Restoring streams in an urbanizing world [J].
Bernhardt, Emily S. ;
Palmer, Margaret A. .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04) :738-751
[6]   Underlying principles of restoration [J].
Bradshaw, AD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1996, 53 :3-9
[7]  
Brierley GJ, 2005, GEOMORPHOLOGY AND RIVER MANAGEMENT: APPLICATIONS OF THE RIVER STYLES FRAMEWORK, P1
[8]   Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains [J].
Buijs, Arjen E. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (08) :2680-2689
[9]  
Chiari S., 2008, P 4 ECRR INT C RIV R, P599
[10]  
Clewell Andre., 2007, ECOLOGICAL RESTORATI