Comparisons of Hybrid Multi-Objective Programming Algorithms with Grey Target and PCA for Weapon System Portfolio Selection

被引:7
作者
Dou, Yajie [1 ]
Zhang, Pengle [1 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ]
Yang, Kewei [1 ]
Chen, Yingwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Informat Syst & Management, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES | 2014年 / 8卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Weapon system portfolio selection (WSPS); multi-objective programming (MOP); grey target (GT); principal component analysis (PCA); DECISION-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.12785/amis/080356
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Weapon Systems Portfolio Selection (WSPS) can be considered as a multi-objective decision analysis (MODA) problem. Aiming at its challenging features because of, 1) interactions and independencies among weapon systems, 2) the uncertainty of the sample data set for assessment, and 3) the missing target value of the assessment criteria, the WSPS problem is solved form four perspectives: portfolio without the independencies or target value, portfolio with the independencies but without target value, portfolio with the independencies and target value, portfolio in a incomplete sample data with the independencies and with target value. The synergy concept is introduced to describe the independencies among systems and Grey Target (GT) and principal component analysis (PCA) method are employed in this study to deal with the missing target value and incomplete sample data set. Three hybrid multi-objective programming algorithms are proposed as GT-MOP1, GT-MOP2 and PCA-MOP2 and non-dominated portfolios are generated as by sorting algorithm as a set of Pareto-optimal solutions. Finally, numerical experiments are given under four scenarios to illustrate the feasibilities and advantages of the three hybrid algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1399
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Principal component analysis [J].
Abdi, Herve ;
Williams, Lynne J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2010, 2 (04) :433-459
[2]  
Ahn C. W., 2003, STUDY DETERMINING MI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Principal components analysis
[4]   Mission oriented risk and design analysis of critical information systems [J].
Buckshaw, DL ;
Parnell, GS ;
Unkenholz, WL ;
Parks, DL ;
Wallner, JM ;
Saydjari, OS .
MILITARY OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 10 (02) :19-38
[5]   APPLICATIONS OF DECISION-ANALYSIS TO THE MILITARY SYSTEMS ACQUISITION PROCESS [J].
BUEDE, DM ;
BRESNICK, TA .
INTERFACES, 1992, 22 (06) :110-125
[6]  
Burk R., 2011, PORTFOLIO DECISION A, P335
[7]  
Burk RC, 2011, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V162, P333, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9943-6_14
[8]   Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yavuz, Serkan ;
Kilinc, Nevzat .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8143-8151
[9]  
Deb K., 2010, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[10]  
Deng J. L., 1990, THEORY GREY SYSTEMS