Residual dipolar couplings and molecular dynamic calculations as a source for refinement of protein spatial structures

被引:1
作者
Tishchenko, E. V.
Sobol', A. G.
Krachkovskii, S. A.
Vasil'eva, L. I.
Nol'de, S. B.
Shul'ga, A. A.
Kirpichnikov, M. P.
Arseniev, A. S.
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Shemyakin Ovchinnikov Inst Bioorgan Chem, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Moscow Oblast, Russia
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
proteins; spatial structure; NMR; residual dipolar couplings;
D O I
10.1134/S1068162006060057
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The precision of techniques and factors affecting the interpretation of residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) in analysis of spatial structures of partially aligned proteins are discussed. Experimental RDC values were obtained for pairs of H-1-N-15 nuclei of the protein barstar partially aligned in a liquid crystalline matrix of bicelles composed of dimiristoylphosphatidylcholine and dihexanoylphosphatidylcholine. The observed couplings agree well with the spatial structures of barstar determined earlier by X-ray and NMR methods. However, the differences between the experimental and calculated RDCs that were calculated on the basis of the known spatial structures of barstar, exceed the experimental errors three- to fourfold. These discrepancies can be explained by differences in the protein structures in solution and in crystal, a limited precision of the X-ray analysis, and the intramolecular mobility of the protein molecule. A comparison of the results of modeling of the molecular dynamics of barstar in solution, crystal structures, and the experimental RDCs showed that the methods of molecular dynamics provide for a reasonable description of the character and amplitudes of internal motions and they should be considered for the correct determination of protein spatial structures from NMR spectroscopic data.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 541
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Protein backbone dynamics from N-HN dipolar couplings in partially aligned systems:: a comparison of motional models in the presence of structural noise [J].
Bouvignies, G ;
Bernadó, P ;
Blackledge, M .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2005, 173 (02) :328-338
[2]   Internal and overall peptide group motion in proteins: molecular dynamics simulations for lysozyme compared with results from X-ray and NMR spectroscopy [J].
Buck, M ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 121 (41) :9645-9658
[3]  
Bystrov V. F., 1976, PROGR NMR SPECTROSCO, V10, P41
[4]   Solution structure of subunit F6 from the peripheral stalk region of ATP synthase from bovine heart mitochondria [J].
Carbajo, RJ ;
Silvester, JA ;
Runswick, MJ ;
Walker, JE ;
Neuhaus, D .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 342 (02) :593-603
[5]   DEVIATIONS FROM THE SIMPLE 2-PARAMETER MODEL-FREE APPROACH TO THE INTERPRETATION OF N-15 NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RELAXATION OF PROTEINS [J].
CLORE, GM ;
SZABO, A ;
BAX, A ;
KAY, LE ;
DRISCOLL, PC ;
GRONENBORN, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 112 (12) :4989-4991
[6]   Observation of through-hydrogen-bond 2hJHC′ in a perdeuterated protein [J].
Cordier, F ;
Rogowski, M ;
Grzesiek, S ;
Bax, A .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1999, 140 (02) :510-512
[7]   NMR determination of the magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of cytochrome c′ of Rhodobacter capsulatus by 1JHN dipolar coupling constants measurement:: Characterization of its monomeric state in solution [J].
Déméné, H ;
Tsan, P ;
Gans, P ;
Marion, D .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2000, 104 (11) :2559-2569
[8]   Solution structure of a consensus stem-loop D RNA domain that plays important roles in regulating translation and replication in enteroviruses and rhinoviruses [J].
Du, ZH ;
Yu, JH ;
Ulyanov, NB ;
Andino, R ;
James, TL .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 43 (38) :11959-11972
[9]  
Ernst R. R., 1987, PRINCIPLES NUCL MAGN
[10]   Refined NMR structure of α-sarcin by 15N-1H residual dipolar couplings [J].
García-Mayoral, MF ;
Pantoja-Uceda, D ;
Santoro, J ;
del Pozo, AM ;
Gavilanes, JG ;
Rico, M ;
Bruix, M .
EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL WITH BIOPHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 34 (08) :1057-1065