Does family involvement explain why corporate social responsibility affects earnings management?

被引:106
作者
Liu, Mingzhi [1 ]
Shi, Yulin [1 ]
Wilson, Craig [2 ]
Wu, Zhenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, 181 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V4, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Edward Sch Business, 56 PotashCorp,25 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A7, Canada
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Family involvement; Accrual-based earnings management; Real earnings management; REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; OWNERSHIP; AGENCY; COST; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate how family involvement in the ownership, management, or governance of a business affects its engagement in earnings management both directly and indirectly through its corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Using a sample of S&P 500 companies, we find that family firms tend to have higher CSR performance, which can help them to maintain legitimacy and preserve socio-emotional wealth. Family firms also engage in less accrual-based earnings management, although they are indistinguishable from non-family firms in terms of real earnings management. In contrast to previous research, we find that CSR performance is not significantly associated with either accrual-based or real earnings management behavior after we account for the effect of family involvement. Our findings suggest that the association between CSR performance and family involvement is the primary driver of the relation between CSR performance and earnings management documented in previous research. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Mansi, SA ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 68 (02) :263-285
[2]  
Bowen H.R., 2013, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT
[3]   Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence [J].
Chih, Hsiang-Lin ;
Shen, Chung-Hua ;
Kang, Feng-Ching .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 79 (1-2) :179-198
[4]   VARIATIONS IN R&D INVESTMENTS OF FAMILY AND NONFAMILY FIRMS: BEHAVIORAL AGENCY AND MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION PERSPECTIVES [J].
Chrisman, James J. ;
Patel, Pankaj C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (04) :976-997
[5]  
Chua J. H., 1999, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, V23, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1177/104225879902300402, 10.1177/104225879902300402]
[6]   Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods [J].
Cohen, Daniel A. ;
Dey, Aiyesha ;
Lys, Thomas Z. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (03) :757-787
[7]   Corporate social responsibility and family business in spain [J].
Déniz, MDLCD ;
Suárez, MKC .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 56 (01) :27-41
[8]   Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting [J].
Dhaliwal, Dan S. ;
Li, Oliver Zhen ;
Tsang, Albert ;
Yang, Yong George .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (01) :59-100
[9]   Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Dyer, W. Gibb, Jr. ;
Whetten, David A. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (06) :785-802
[10]   Corporate Social Responsibility theories:: Mapping the territory [J].
Garriga, E ;
Melé, DN .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 53 (1-2) :51-71