Dual Fluidized Bed Gasification Configurations for Carbon Recovery from Biomass

被引:10
作者
Pissot, Sebastien [1 ]
Vilches, Teresa Berdugo [1 ]
Thunman, Henrik [1 ]
Seemann, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Space Earth & Environm, Div Energy Technol, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
CHEMICAL-LOOPING COMBUSTION; LAYER FORMATION; TAR ELIMINATION; K-FELDSPAR; PARTICLES; MECHANISM; PERFORMANCE; CATALYSTS; GASIFIER; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02781
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Techniques that produce chemicals and fuels from sustainable carbon sources will have to maximize the carbon recovery to support circularity. In dual fluidized bed (DFB) gasification, to facilitate carbon recovery, the CO2 from the flue gas can be concentrated using pure oxygen as an oxidant. The heat required by the process can also be provided electrically or by oxidizing an oxygen-carrying bed material, rather than combusting part of the char, thereby concentrating all of the carbon in the syngas. In this work, the three configurations of oxyfuel, electrical, and chemical-looping gasification (CLG) are compared to each other, as well as to the standard or "air" configuration, which corresponds to the combustion of char with air and the separation of CO2 from both the flue gas and syngas. The configurations are compared based on their carbon distributions and energy demands for CO2 separation. We show that the air and oxyfuel configurations lead to similar carbon distributions, whereas the CLG configuration gives the lowest carbon recovery in the form of an end product. The oxyfuel and CLG configurations show the lowest energy demands for CO2 separation, while the air configuration exhibits the highest. The electrical configuration has the lowest potential to benefit from heat integration to cover this energy demand. An investigation into the optimal gasification temperature for the air and oxyfuel configurations shows that there is no driver for operation at high temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:16187 / 16200
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Review of catalysts for tar elimination in Biomass gasification processes
    Abu El-Rub, Z
    Bramer, EA
    Brem, G
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (22) : 6911 - 6919
  • [2] Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review
    Al-Salem, S. M.
    Lettieri, P.
    Baeyens, J.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (10) : 2625 - 2643
  • [3] Performance of large-scale biomass gasifiers in a biorefinery, a state-of-the-art reference
    Alamia, Alberto
    Larsson, Anton
    Breitholtz, Claes
    Thunman, Henrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2017, 41 (14) : 2001 - 2019
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 15 C
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Cryogenic and PTSA Technologies for Systems of Oxygen Production
    Banaszkiewicz, T.
    Chorowski, M.
    Gizicki, W.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CRYOGENIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 1573 : 1373 - 1378
  • [6] Fuel flexible gasification with an advanced 100 kW dual fluidized bed steam gasification pilot plant
    Benedikt, F.
    Schmid, J. C.
    Fuchs, J.
    Mauerhofer, A. M.
    Mueller, S.
    Hofbauer, H.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 164 : 329 - 343
  • [7] Berdugo Vilches T., 2015, IMPACT OXYGEN TRANSP
  • [8] Alkali-Feldspar as a Catalyst for Biomass Gasification in a 2-MW Indirect Gasifier
    Berguerand, Nicolas
    Vilches, Teresa Berdugo
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2017, 31 (02) : 1583 - 1592
  • [9] Self-segregation of high-volatile fuel particles during devolatilization in a fluidized bed reactor
    Bruni, G
    Solimene, R
    Marzocchella, A
    Salatino, P
    Yates, JG
    Lettieri, P
    Fiorentino, M
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 128 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [10] Bui M, 2018, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V11, P1062, DOI [10.1039/c7ee02342a, 10.1039/C7EE02342A]