Automaticity of Word Reading: Evidence From the Semantic Stroop Paradigm

被引:77
作者
Augustinova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Ferrand, Ludovic
机构
[1] CNRS, F-63037 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Clermont Ferrand, F-63037 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
automaticity; response conflict; semantic conflict; Stroop interference; word reading; STIMULUS-STIMULUS; TASK; INTERFERENCE; ATTENTION; MYTH; RECOGNITION; SUGGESTION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1177/0963721414540169
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Various lines of research have independently reported that different interventions reduce or even eliminate Stroop interference. Because such findings have been interpreted as evidence that word reading can be prevented and/or controlled, these lines of research challenge the widespread automatic view of word reading. This article provides methodological and empirical arguments explaining why such conclusions might not be warranted and summarizes direct empirical evidence showing that interventions used in past studies have not yet been found to prevent or impose any control over word reading in the Stroop task. The main conclusion of this article is that the processes involved in word reading might (still) be considered automatic.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 348
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Augustinova M, 2007, ANN PSYCHOL, V107, P163
[2]   Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: What component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced? [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
COGNITION, 2014, 130 (03) :442-454
[3]   The influence of mere social presence on Stroop interference: New evidence from the semantically-based Stroop task [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (05) :1213-1216
[4]   Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: Evidence from the semantically based Stroop task [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (03) :521-527
[5]   Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Flaudias, Valentin ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (06) :827-833
[7]   The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity [J].
Besner, D ;
Stolz, JA ;
Boutilier, C .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (02) :221-225
[8]   Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: Testing the limits of involuntary word processing [J].
Brown, TL ;
Joenfleit, K ;
Robinson, CS ;
Brown, CR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 115 (04) :515-543
[9]   Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: Is word recognition "automatic"? [J].
Brown, TL ;
Gore, CL ;
Carr, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (02) :220-240
[10]   Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition [J].
Catena, A ;
Fuentes, LJ ;
Tudela, P .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (01) :113-118