Greenhouse Gas Emissions Embodied in Reinforced Concrete and Timber Railway Sleepers

被引:21
作者
Crawford, Robert H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1021/es8023836
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Australia, there are currently two main materials used for railway sleepers: timber (river red gum, a species of eucalypt) and reinforced concrete. Within the state of Victoria alone, there are currently seven million railway sleepers that make up the rail network. It is estimated that around two million sleepers, or 29%, are presently required to replace timber sleepers and upgrade the entire network, for which there are significant environmental implications, such as the emission of greenhouse gases. These emissions are mainly as a result of the energy and other resources required or "embodied" through the sleeper manufacture, including those associated with harvesting timber and mining raw materials for manufacturing cement. Where alternatives are readily available, it is important that the environmental impacts of the various choices are assessed, ensuring that these impacts are minimized. This study aimed to assess the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with timber and reinforced concrete railway sleepers and showed that the life cycle emissions of reinforced concrete sleepers were up to six times less than the emissions associated with timber sleepers. Taking the potential errors associated with this type of assessment into account, there appears to be a significant advantage in using reinforced concrete sleepers, in terms of reducing the life cycle emissions associated with the provision of railway sleepers.
引用
收藏
页码:3885 / 3890
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AEF, FOR CAMP CAN SEE EM
[2]  
[Anonymous], J CONSTR RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report No. 17
[4]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2003, NAT ACC 2000 01
[5]  
*AUSTR GREENH OFF, 2005, AUSTR METH EST GREEN
[6]   Input-output analysis: Input of energy, CO2, and work to produce goods [J].
Born, P .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1996, 18 (02) :217-221
[7]  
Bullard C.W., 1978, RESOUR ENERG, V1, P267, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7, DOI 10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7, 10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7]
[8]  
*CEM IND FED, 2006, INVENTORY CARBON DIO
[9]  
Crawford R.H., 2005, J. Constr. Res, V6, P71, DOI [10.1142/S1609945105000250, DOI 10.1142/S1609945105000250]
[10]   Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method [J].
Crawford, Robert H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :496-506