Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: Traces, dominance, and numerical representations

被引:22
作者
Bouyssou, D
Pirlot, M
机构
[1] Univ Paris 09, CNRS, LAMSADE, F-75775 Paris 16, France
[2] Fac Polytech Mons, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Serv Math Gest, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
conjoint measurement; nontransitive preferences; decision analysis with multiple attributes; dominance; traces;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmp.2004.02.005
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes conjoint measurement models allowing for intransitive and/or incomplete preferences. This analysis is based on the study of marginal traces induced on coordinates by the preference relation and uses conditions guaranteeing that these marginal traces are complete. Within the framework of these models, we propose a simple axiomatic characterization of preference relations compatible with the notion of dominance. We show that all such relations have a nontrivial numerical representation. Our results allow us to establish useful connections between two lines of thought in the area of decision analysis with multiple attributes that have largely remained unrelated: the one based on conjoint measurement and the one emphasizing the idea of dominance. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 185
页数:19
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Aleskerov F., 2002, Utility maximization, choice and preference
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MULTICRITERIA DECISI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GEN MODEL PREFERENCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, DECISION THEORY INTR
[5]  
[Anonymous], AIDING DECISIONS MUL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ADDITIVE REPRESENTAT
[8]   Construction of rule-based assignment models [J].
Azibi, R ;
Vanderpooten, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 138 (02) :274-293
[9]   NUMERICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF IMPERFECTLY ORDERED PREFERENCES (A UNIFIED GEOMETRIC EXPOSITION) [J].
BEJA, A ;
GILBOA, I .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 36 (03) :426-449
[10]  
Belton V., 2001, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE