Mandatory national quality improvement systems using indicators: An initial assessment in Europe and Israel

被引:22
作者
Bramesfeld, Anke [1 ,2 ]
Wensing, Michel [3 ]
Bartels, Paul [4 ]
Bobzin, Henning [1 ]
Grenier, Catherine [5 ]
Heugren, Mona [6 ]
Hirschfield, Dena Jaffe [7 ,8 ]
Langenegger, Manfred [9 ]
Lindelius, Birgitta [6 ]
Lucet, Bruno [5 ]
Manor, Orly [5 ]
Schneider, Theres [9 ]
Wardell, Fiona [10 ]
Szecsenyi, Joachim [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] AQUA Inst Appl Qual Improvement & Res Hlth Care, Maschmuhlenweg 8, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Epidemiol Social Med & Hlth Syst Res, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Geert Grootepl 21, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Danish Clin Registries, Olaf Palmes Alle 15, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Direct Ameliorat Qualite & Securite Soins, Haute Autorite Sante 2,Ave Stade France, F-93218 La Plaine St Denis, France
[6] Natl Board Hlth & Welf, Ralambsvagen 3, SE-10630 Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem Hadassah Hosp & Med Sch, Braun Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[8] Kantar Hlth, Hlth Outcomes Practice, Jerusalem, Israel
[9] Direkt Bere Kranken & Unfallversicherung, Bundesamt Gesundheit BAG, Schwarzenburgerstr 175, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland
[10] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Delta House,50 West Nile St, Glasgow G1 2NP, Lanark, Scotland
[11] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, Vossstr 2, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Quality assurance; Health care; Quality indicators; Health care systems; Quality of health care; Health services research; HEALTH-CARE; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; OUTCOME DATA; ASSURANCE; GERMANY; PERFORMANCE; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Quality improvement systems (QIS) that are based on empirical performance assessment have increasingly been implemented as a mandatory part of health systems across countries. This study aims to describe national mandatory QIS in Europe in 2014. Materials and methods: Relevant national agencies for national mandatory QIS in Europe were identified through online searches and key informants. A questionnaire was compiled during a workshop with these agencies and filled out by representatives from these particular agencies. Results: Agencies in charge of national mandatory QIS in seven countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Scotland, Sweden and Switzerland) were included in the study. An analysis of QIS revealed similarities, such as the use of routine data for performance assessment and the aim to hold healthcare providers accountable. Differences relate to the different forms of feedback systems and improvement mechanisms used. Trends include the development towards greater implementation of QIS within health systems, the inclusion of the patient's perspective in performance assessment, and experiments with pay for performance-related measures. Conclusion: On a country level, for health systems striving for newly implementing QIS it is recommended to start where routine data is available, add qualitative methodologies once the QIS is getting more complex, report performance data back to service providers and be patient centred. On the inter-country level exchange of information between agencies commissioned with implementing national QIS is very much needed for 1. Better understanding the other systems; 2. Gaining inspiration; 3. Working towards obtaining better evidence on the impact that the different tools used and measures taken by national QIS have on the quality of care at health system level. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1269
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSSING THE QUALITY
[2]  
AQUA, 2014, GERMAN HOSPITAL QUAL
[3]  
AQUA, 2014, ARTHR KNIEG IND 1 1, P2014
[4]   Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement [J].
Arah, OA ;
Klazinga, NS ;
Delnoij, DMJ ;
Ten Asbroek, AHA ;
Custers, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (05) :377-398
[5]   A conceptual framework for the OECD health care quality indicators project [J].
Arah, Onyebuchi A. ;
Westert, Gert P. ;
Hurst, Jeremy ;
Klazinga, Niek S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 18 :5-13
[6]  
Braithwaite J, 2005, THE GOVERNANCE OF HE
[7]   Monitoring mental healthcare on a system level: Country profiles and status from EU countries [J].
Bramesfeld, Anke ;
Amaddeo, Francesco ;
Caldas-de-Almeida, Jose ;
Cardoso, Graca ;
Depaigne-Loth, Anne ;
Derenne, Rose ;
Donisi, Valeria ;
Jorgensen, Mette ;
Lindelius, Birgitta ;
Lora, Antonio ;
Mainz, Jan ;
Mulder, Cornelis Lambert ;
Szecsenyi, Joachim ;
Killaspy, Helen .
HEALTH POLICY, 2016, 120 (06) :706-717
[8]   Developing cross-sectoral quality assurance for cataract surgery in the statutory quality assurance program of the German health care system: Experiences and lessons learned [J].
Bramesfeld, Anke ;
Pauletzki, Juergen ;
Behrenz, Lars ;
Szecsenyi, Joachim ;
Willms, Gerald ;
Broge, Bjoern .
HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (08) :1017-1022
[9]   Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years [J].
Bridgewater, Ben ;
Grayson, Antony D. ;
Brooks, Nicholas ;
Grotte, Geir ;
Fabri, Brian M. ;
Au, John ;
Hooper, Tim ;
Jones, Mark ;
Keogh, Bruce .
HEART, 2007, 93 (06) :744-748
[10]   Measuring, Monitoring, And Managing Quality In Germany's Hospitals [J].
Busse, Reinhard ;
Nimptsch, Ulrike ;
Mansky, Thomas .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (02) :W294-W304