Effectiveness of public health messaging and communication channels during smoke events: A rapid systematic review

被引:47
作者
Fish, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Peters, Micah D. J. [2 ]
Ramsey, Imogen [1 ]
Sharplin, Greg [3 ]
Corsini, Nadia [3 ]
Eckert, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth Sci, Joanna Briggs Inst, Lvl 3,55 King William Rd,Norwich House, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
[3] Canc Council SA, Behav Res & Evaluat Unit, 202 Greenhill Rd, Eastwood, SA 5063, Australia
关键词
Smoke; Fire; Risk communication; Messages; Public health; Information dissemination; RISK COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL TRUST; FIRE SMOKE; WILDLAND; MANAGEMENT; PREPAREDNESS; AUSTRALIA; EXPOSURE; ADOPTION; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exposure to smoke emitted from wildfire and planned burns. (i.e., smoke events) has been associated with numerous negative health outcomes, including respiratory symptoms and conditions. This rapid review investigates recent evidence (post-2009) regarding the effectiveness of public health messaging during smoke events. The objectives were to determine the effectiveness of various communication channels used and public health messages disseminated during smoke events, for general and at -risk populations. A search of 12 databases and grey literature yielded 1775 unique articles, of which 10 were included in this review. Principal results were: 1) Smoke -related public health messages are communicated via a variety of channels, but limited evidence is available regarding their effectiveness for the general public or at -risk groups. 2) Messages that use simple language are more commonly recalled, understood, and complied with. Compliance differs according to socio-demographic characteristics. 3) At -risk groups may be advised to stay indoors before the general population, in order to protect the most vulnerable people in a community. The research included in this review was observational and predominantly descriptive, and is therefore unable to sufficiently answer questions regarding effectiveness. Experimental research, as well as evaluations, are required to examine the effectiveness of modern communication channels, channels to reach at-risk groups, and the 'stay indoors' message. (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Review of the health effects of wildland fire smoke on wildland firefighters and the public [J].
Adetona, Olorunfemi ;
Reinhardt, Timothy E. ;
Domitrovich, Joe ;
Broyles, George ;
Adetona, Anna M. ;
Kleinman, Michael T. ;
Ottmar, Roger D. ;
Naeher, Luke P. .
INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) :95-139
[2]  
[Anonymous], JBI APPR LEV EV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RISK COMMUNICATION H
[4]  
[Anonymous], NCCARF AD S AUSTR
[5]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH MED INF
[6]  
[Anonymous], REV PUBLIC COMMUNICA
[7]  
[Anonymous], CRITICAL APPRAISAL T
[8]  
Bennett Peter., 2010, RISK COMMUNICATION P, V2nd
[9]   Smoke management of wildland and prescribed fire: understanding public preferences and trade-offs [J].
Blades, Jarod J. ;
Shook, Steven R. ;
Hall, Troy E. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2014, 44 (11) :1344-1355
[10]   From hypothetical scenario to tragic reality: A salutary lesson in risk communication and the Victorian 2009 bushfires [J].
Burns, Robin ;
Robinson, Priscilla ;
Smith, Penelope .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 34 (01) :24-31