A Comparison Among Cognitive Architectures: A Theoretical Analysis

被引：13

作者：

Lucentini, Danilo Fernando ^{[1
]}

Gudwin, Ricardo Ribeiro ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil

来源：

6TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES (BICA 2015) | 2015年 / 71卷

关键词：

Cognitive architectures; Cognitive science; SOAR; CLARION; LIDA;

D O I：

10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.198

中图分类号：

TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

In this paper we present a theoretical comparison among three of the most popular cognitive architectures: SOAR, LIDA and CLARION. These architectures are compared based on a set of cognitive functions supposed to exist in the human cognitive cycle, and how each architecture deals with them. The comparison emphasizes similarities and differences among the architectures, with the purpose to advise a potential user how to identify the best architecture to employ, depending on the situation.

引用

页码：56 / 61

页数：6

共 12 条

[1] How conscious experience and working memory interact [J].

Baars, BJ ;

Franklin, S .

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (04) :166-172

[2]

BICA Society, 2012, COMP TABL COGN ARCH

[3]

Craig R.T., 2007, Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions

[4]

Eliasmith Chris, 2003, ENCY COGNITIVE SCI

[5]

Franklin S., 2006, pat, V703, P764

[6] Progress in machine consciousness [J].

Gamez, David .

CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2008, 17 (03) :887-910

[7]

Laird John E, 2002, SOAR USER MANUAL VER

[8]

Nilsson N., 1998, ARTIF INTELL

[9]

Ramamurthy U., 2006, LIDA WORKING MODEL C

[10] Desiderata for cognitive architectures [J].

Sun, R .

PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 17 (03) :341-373

← 1 2 →