Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach

被引:116
作者
Bansil, Pooja [1 ]
Wittet, Scott [1 ]
Lim, Jeanette L. [1 ]
Winkler, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Paul, Proma [1 ]
Jeronimo, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] PATH, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
来源
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH | 2014年 / 14卷
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Self-sampling; Experiences; Cervical cancer screening; Human papillomavirus (HPV); Low income resource settings; CERVICAL-CANCER; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; WOMEN; UGANDA;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-14-596
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaginal self-sampling with HPV-DNA tests is a promising primary screening method for cervical cancer. However, women's experiences, concerns and the acceptability of such tests in low-resource settings remain unknown. Methods: In India, Nicaragua, and Uganda, a mixed-method design was used to collect data from surveys (N = 3,863), qualitative interviews (N = 72; 20 providers and 52 women) and focus groups (N = 30 women) on women's and providers' experiences with self-sampling, women's opinions of sampling at home, and their future needs. Results: Among surveyed women, 90% provided a self-collected sample. Of these, 75% reported it was easy, although 52% were initially concerned about hurting themselves and 24% were worried about not getting a good sample. Most surveyed women preferred self-sampling (78%). However it was not clear if they responded to the privacy of self-sampling or the convenience of avoiding a pelvic examination, or both. In follow-up interviews, most women reported that they didn't mind self-sampling, but many preferred to have a provider collect the vaginal sample. Most women also preferred clinic-based screening (as opposed to home-based self-sampling), because the sample could be collected by a provider, women could receive treatment if needed, and the clinic was sanitary and provided privacy. Self-sampling acceptability was higher when providers prepared women through education, allowed women to examine the collection brush, and were present during the self-collection process. Among survey respondents, aids that would facilitate self-sampling in the future were: staff help (53%), additional images in the illustrated instructions (31%), and a chance to practice beforehand with a doll/model (26%). Conclusion: Self-and vaginal-sampling are widely acceptable among women in low-resource settings. Providers have a unique opportunity to educate and prepare women for self-sampling and be flexible in accommodating women's preference for self-sampling.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Mexican Cervical Cancer Screening Study II Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampler [J].
Arriba, Lucybeth Nieves ;
Enerson, Christine L. ;
Belinson, Suzanne ;
Novick, Loyd ;
Belinson, Jerome .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (08) :1415-1423
[2]   Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action [J].
Barbee, Lindley ;
Kobetz, Erin ;
Menard, Janelle ;
Cook, Nicole ;
Blanco, Jenny ;
Barton, Betsy ;
Auguste, Pascale ;
McKenzie, Nathalie .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2010, 21 (03) :421-431
[3]   Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening [J].
Cuzick, Jack ;
Clavel, Christine ;
Petry, Karl-Ulrich ;
Meijer, Chris J. L. M. ;
Hoyer, Heike ;
Ratnam, Samuel ;
Szarewski, Anne ;
Birembaut, Philippe ;
Kulasingam, Shalini ;
Sasieni, Peter ;
Iftner, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (05) :1095-1101
[4]   The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening [J].
Dzuba, IG ;
Díaz, EY ;
Allen, B ;
Leonard, YF ;
Ponce, ECL ;
Shah, KV ;
Bishai, D ;
Lorincz, A ;
Ferris, D ;
Turnbull, B ;
Avila, MH ;
Salmerón, J .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (03) :265-274
[5]   Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Shin, Hai-Rim ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Forman, David ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (12) :2893-2917
[6]   Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK [J].
Forrest, S ;
McCaffery, K ;
Waller, J ;
Desai, M ;
Szarewski, A ;
Cadman, L ;
Wardle, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (02) :85-88
[7]   EUROGIN 2010 roadmap on cervical cancer prevention [J].
Franceschi, Silvia ;
Denny, Lynette ;
Irwin, Kathleen L. ;
Jeronimo, Jose ;
Lopalco, Pier Luigi ;
Monsonego, Joseph ;
Peto, Julian ;
Ronco, Guglielmo ;
Sasieni, Peter ;
Wheeler, Cosette M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 128 (12) :2765-2774
[8]   Persistent HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer Risk: Is the Scientific Rationale for Changing the Screening Paradigm Enough? [J].
Franco, Eduardo L. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (19) :1451-1453
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries [J].
Goldie, SJ ;
Gaffikin, L ;
Goldhaber-Fiebert, JD ;
Gordillo-Tobar, A ;
Levin, C ;
Mahé, C ;
Wright, TC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (20) :2158-2168
[10]   Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy [J].
Gravitt, Patti E. ;
Belinson, Jerome L. ;
Salmeron, Jorge ;
Shah, Keerti V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 129 (03) :517-527