New Generation Cardiac Contractility Modulation DeviceFilling the Gap in Heart Failure Treatment

被引:21
|
作者
Tint, Diana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Florea, Roxana [4 ]
Micu, Sorin [3 ]
机构
[1] Transilvania Univ, Fac Med, Bd Eroilor 29, Brasov 500036, Romania
[2] ICCO Clin, Bd Eroilor 29, Brasov 500036, Romania
[3] Sorin Micu ICCO Clin, Str Scolii 8, Brasov 500059, Romania
[4] UCL, Dept Neurosci Physiol & Pharmacol, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
heart failure; cardiac contractility modulation; cardiac devices; device implantation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; EJECTION FRACTION; DEFIBRILLATOR; GUIDELINES; EXPRESSION; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm8050588
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Despite substantial progress in its prevention and treatment, mortality rates remain high. Device therapy for HF mainly includes cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Recently, however, a new device therapycardiac contractility modulation (CCM)became available. (2) Aim: The purpose of this study is to present a first case-series of patients with different clinical patterns of HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), supported with the newest generation of CCM devices. (3) Methods and results: Five patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III were supported with CCM OPTIMIZER((R)) SMART IPGCCMX10 at our clinic. The patients had a median age of 67 +/- 8.03 years (47-80) and were all malesfour with ischemic etiology dilated cardiomyopathy. In two cases, CCM was added on top of CRT (non-responders), and, in one patient, CCM was delivered during persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). After 6 months of follow-up, the LVEF increased from 25.4 +/- 6.8% to 27 +/- 9%, and the six-minute walk distance increased from 310 +/- 65.1 m to 466 +/- 23.6 m. One patient died 47 days after device implantation. (4) Conclusion: CCM therapy provided with the new model OPTIMIZER((R)) SMART IPG CCMX10 is safe, feasible, and applicable to a wide range of patients with HF.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure A meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Liu, X.
    Yang, H. J.
    Ping, H. Q.
    Qiu, S.
    Shi, S.
    Yang, B.
    HERZ, 2017, 42 (08) : 766 - 775
  • [32] Improvement of long-term survival by cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure patients: A case-control study
    Liu, Ming
    Fang, Fang
    Luo, Xiu Xia
    Shlomo, Ben-Haim
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Chan, Joseph Y. S.
    Chan, Chin-Pang
    Cheung, Lili
    Rousso, Benny
    Gutterman, David
    Yu, Cheuk-Man
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 206 : 122 - 126
  • [33] Cardiac contractility modulation for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Peysh A. Patel
    Ramesh Nadarajah
    Noman Ali
    John Gierula
    Klaus K. Witte
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2021, 26 : 217 - 226
  • [34] Cardiac Contractility Modulation Implications in Heart Failure, a Current Review
    Wallner, Alexander L.
    Savona, Salvatore
    Kahwash, Rami
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [35] Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Heart Failure: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence
    Alexis Barnes
    Courtney Campbell
    Raul Weiss
    Rami Kahwash
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2020, 22
  • [36] Cardiac contractility modulation: from molecular patterns to tailored treatment in heart failure subgroups
    Pierucci, Nicola
    D'amato, Andrea
    Fanisio, Francesca
    Bruti, Raffaele M.
    V. Mariani, Marco
    Prosperi, Silvia
    Francia, Aurora Labbro
    Filomena, Domenico
    Trivigno, Sara
    La Fazia, Vincenzo M.
    Piro, Agostino
    Badagliacca, Roberto
    Chimenti, Cristina
    Severino, Paolo
    Lavalle, Carlo
    MINERVA CARDIOLOGY AND ANGIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [37] Improved Physical Function After Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in 10 Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
    Vartanian, Karine
    Franco, Miguel
    Busse, Nathalie
    Bidzhoian, Sofiia
    Hamdan, Tesnim
    von Schwarz, Ernst R.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2022, 49 (06)
  • [38] A randomized comparison of 5 versus 12 hours per day of cardiac contractility modulation treatment for heart failure patients: A preliminary report
    Kloppe, Axel
    Mijic, Dejan
    Schiedat, Fabian
    Bogossian, Harilaos
    Muegge, Andreas
    Rousso, Benny
    Lemke, Bernd
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (01) : 114 - 119
  • [39] Cardiac contractility modulation in patients with advanced heart failure
    Kahwash, Rami
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Abraham, William T.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2013, 11 (05) : 635 - 645
  • [40] Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure patients: Randomized comparison of signal delivery through one vs. two ventricular leads
    Roeger, Susanne
    Said, Samir
    Kloppe, Axel
    Lawo, Thomas
    Emig, Ulf
    Rousso, Benny
    Gutterman, David
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Kuschyk, Juergen
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (1-2) : 326 - 332