A Chance Constrained Information-Gap Decision Model for Multi-Period Microgrid Planning

被引:81
作者
Cao, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Wang, Jianxue [1 ]
Zeng, Bo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Ind Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15106 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Microgrid; multi-period expansion planning; information gap decision theory; chance constrained program; bilinear Benders decomposition; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; GENERATION; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2747625
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper presents a chance constrained information gap decision model for multi-period microgrid expansion planning (MMEP) considering two categories of uncertainties, namely random and non-random uncertainties. The main task of MMEP is to determine the optimal sizing, type selection, and installation time of distributed energy resources (DER) in microgrid. In the proposed formulation, information gap decision theory (IGDT) is applied to hedge against the non-random uncertainties of long-term demand growth. Then, chance constraints are imposed in the operational stage to address the random uncertainties of hourly renewable energy generation and load variation. The objective of chance constrained information gap decision model is to maximize the robustness level of DER investment meanwhile satisfying a set of operational constraints with a high probability. The integration of IGDT and chance constrained program, however, makes it very challenging to compute. To address this challenge, we propose and implement a strengthened bilinear Benders decomposition method. Finally, the effectiveness of proposed planning model is verified through the numerical studies on both the simple and practical complex microgrid. Also, our new computational method demonstrates a superior solution capacity and scalability. Compared to directly using a professional mixed integer programming solver, it could reduce the computational time by orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:2684 / 2695
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Optimal Robust Unit Commitment of CHP Plants in Electricity Markets Using Information Gap Decision Theory [J].
Aghaei, Jamshid ;
Agelidis, Vassilios G. ;
Charwand, Mansour ;
Raeisi, Fatima ;
Ahmadi, Abdollah ;
Nezhad, Ali Esmaeel ;
Heidari, Alireza .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2017, 8 (05) :2296-2304
[2]   Reliability-Constrained Optimal Sizing of Energy Storage System in a Microgrid [J].
Bahramirad, Shaghayegh ;
Reder, Wanda ;
Khodaei, Amin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2012, 3 (04) :2056-2062
[3]  
BenHaim Y., 2006, Infogap decision theory: Decisions under severe uncertainty
[4]   Effects of load forecast uncertainty on bulk electric system reliability evaluation [J].
Billinton, Roy ;
Huang, Dange .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) :418-425
[5]   Robust optimal sizing of a hybrid energy stand-alone system [J].
Billionnet, Alain ;
Costa, Marie-Christine ;
Poirion, Pierre-Louis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (02) :565-575
[6]   TRADE OFF METHODS IN SYSTEM-PLANNING [J].
BURKE, WJ ;
SCHWEPPE, FC ;
LOVELL, BE ;
MERRILL, HM ;
MCCOY, MF ;
MONOHON, SA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1988, 3 (03) :1284-1290
[7]  
Buygi M. O., 2004, ENERGY POWER ENG, V4, P387
[8]   Network planning in unbundled power systems [J].
Buygi, Majid Oloomi ;
Shanechi, Hasan Modir ;
Balzer, Gerd ;
Shahidehpour, Mohammad ;
Pariz, Nasser .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (03) :1379-1387
[9]   Multi-objective optimization of preplanned microgrid islanding based on stochastic short-term simulation [J].
Cao, Xiaoyu ;
Wang, Jianxue ;
Zhang, Zhong .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2017, 27 (01)
[10]   Multi-objective robust transmission expansion planning using information-gap decision theory and augmented e-constraint method [J].
Dehghan, Shahab ;
Kazemi, Ahad ;
Amjady, Nima .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2014, 8 (05) :828-840