Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial

被引:12
作者
Poprzeczny, Amanda J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Grivell, Rosalie M. [4 ,5 ]
Louise, Jennie [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Deussen, Andrea R. [1 ,2 ]
Dodd, Jodie M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Discipline Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Perinatal Med, Womens & Babies Div, 72 King William Rd, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
[4] Southern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Flinders Med Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Caesarean birth; Surgical site infection; Wound closure; Wound complications; Suture techniques; SUTURE MATERIALS; INFECTION-RATES; RISK-FACTORS; DELIVERY; TRENDS; WOMEN; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-03305-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundWound infection is a common complication following caesarean section. Factors influencing the risk of infection may include the suture material for skin closure, and closure of the subcutaneous fascia. We assessed the effect of skin closure with absorbable versus non-absorbable suture, and closure versus non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia on risk of wound infection following Caesarean section.MethodsWomen undergoing caesarean birth at an Adelaide maternity hospital were eligible for recruitment to a randomised trial using a 2x2 factorial design. Women were randomised to either closure or non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia and to subcuticular skin closure with an absorbable or non-absorbable suture.Participants were randomised to each of the two interventions into one of 4 possible groups: Group 1 - non-absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 2 - absorbable skin suture and non-closure of the subcutaneous fascia; Group 3 - non-absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia; and Group 4 - absorbable skin suture and closure of the subcutaneous fascia.The primary outcomes were reported wound infection and wound haematoma or seroma within the first 30days after birth.ResultsA total of 851 women were recruited and randomised, with 849 women included in the analyses (Group 1: 216 women; Group 2: 212 women; Group 3: 212 women; Group 4: 211 women).In women who underwent fascia closure, there was a statistically significant increase in risk of wound infection within 30days post-operatively for those who had skin closure with an absorbable suture (Group 4), compared with women who had skin closure with a non-absorbable suture (Group 3) (adjusted RR 2.17; 95% CI 1.05, 4.45; p=0.035). There was no significant difference in risk of wound infection for absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures in women who did not undergo fascia closure.ConclusionThe combination of subcutaneous fascia closure and skin closure with an absorbable suture may be associated with an increased risk of reported wound infection after caesarean section.Trial registrationProspectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000143325, on the 20th March, 2008.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Allaire AD, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P327
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Reproductive Health Matters, V23, P149, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.RHM.2015.07.007, 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007, 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.00726278843]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COAT VYCR SUT PROD I, V4
[4]   WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates [J].
Betran, A. P. ;
Torloni, M. R. ;
Zhang, J. J. ;
Guelmezoglu, A. M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (05) :667-670
[5]  
Betran Ana Pilar, 2016, Evid Based Med, V21, P237, DOI 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110393
[6]   MONOCRYL(R) SUTURE, A NEW ULTRA-PLIABLE ABSORBABLE MONOFILAMENT SUTURE [J].
BEZWADA, RS ;
JAMIOLKOWSKI, DD ;
LEE, IY ;
AGARWAL, V ;
PERSIVALE, J ;
TRENKABENTHIN, S ;
ERNETA, M ;
SURYADEVARA, J ;
YANG, A ;
LIU, S .
BIOMATERIALS, 1995, 16 (15) :1141-1148
[7]   Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study [J].
Bragg, Fiona ;
Cromwell, David A. ;
Edozien, Leroy C. ;
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek ;
Mahmood, Tahir A. ;
Templeton, Allan ;
van der Meulen, Jan H. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :818
[8]   Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: Effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue [J].
Cetin, A ;
Cetin, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 57 (01) :17-21
[9]  
Chelmow D, 2002, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V11, P403, DOI 10.1080/713605560
[10]   A randomised controlled trial of suture materials used for caesarean section skin closure: Do wound infection rates differ? [J].
Chunder, A. ;
Devjee, J. ;
Khedun, S. M. ;
Moodley, J. ;
Esterhuizen, T. .
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 102 (06) :374-376