Ultrafiltration of surfactant and aromatic/surfactant solutions using ceramic membranes

被引:14
|
作者
Gadelle, F [1 ]
Koros, WJ [1 ]
Schechter, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,DEPT CHEM ENGN,AUSTIN,TX 78712
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie9507181
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Rejection and permeate flux taken together establish the efficiency of an ultrafiltration separation. The controllable factors that may influence the efficiency are systematically studied. These factors include transmembrane pressure, recirculation rate, membrane pore size, and solute and surfactant structure and concentration. Experiments carried out using both cationic and nonionic surfactants show that rejection decreases and permeate flux increases with membranes of increasing pore sizes. However, for the large pore size membrane (200 Angstrom), it is also observed that rejection increases and permeate flux decreases as the filtration proceeds. These unexpected results suggest that micelles penetrate and accumulate into the larger pores, thereby reducing the effective membrane pore size. Depending on the molecular structure and concentration of the surfactant, rejection as high as 99.9% is achieved with a ceramic membrane having 65 Angstrom pores. Permeate fluxes between 30 and 70% of pure water are observed. The addition of a solute tends to improve surfactant rejection and to decrease the permeate flux. Solute rejection increases with surfactant concentration and hydrophobicity. Solubilization isotherms determined here by ultrafiltration are shown to be in agreement with isotherms obtained with head space gas chromatography.
引用
收藏
页码:3687 / 3696
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrafiltration of surfactant and aromatic/surfactant solutions using ceramic membranes
    Gadelle, F.
    Koros, W.J.
    Schechter, R.S.
    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1996, 35 (10): : 3687 - 3696
  • [2] Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions
    Fernández, E
    Benito, JM
    Pazos, C
    Coca, J
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 246 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [3] Surfactant effect on the ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions using ceramic membranes
    Matos, Maria
    Gutierrez, Gemma
    Lobo, Alberto
    Coca, Jose
    Pazos, Carmen
    Benito, Jose M.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2016, 520 : 749 - 759
  • [4] Ultrafiltration of surfactant solutions
    Urbanski, R
    Góralska, E
    Bart, HJ
    Szymanowski, J
    JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 253 (02) : 419 - 426
  • [5] Crossflow ultrafiltration of surfactant solutions
    Yang, JS
    Baek, K
    Yang, JW
    DESALINATION, 2005, 184 (1-3) : 385 - 394
  • [6] Microfiltration of amphoteric surfactant using ceramic membranes
    Chiu, T. Y.
    James, A. E.
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2006, 280 (1-3) : 58 - 65
  • [7] Surfactant cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by whey
    Madaeni, Sayed Siavash
    Rostami, Elham
    Rahimpour, Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 63 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [8] Separation of aromatic alcohols using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and recovery of surfactant
    Purkait, MK
    DasGupta, S
    De, S
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 250 (1-2) : 47 - 59
  • [9] CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION OF MICELLAR SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS
    MARKELS, JH
    LYNN, S
    RADKE, CJ
    AICHE JOURNAL, 1995, 41 (09) : 2058 - 2066
  • [10] Ultrafiltration of aqueous solutions containing a mixture of dye and surfactant
    Majewska-Nowak, Katarzyna
    Kowalska, Izabela
    Kabsch-Korbutowicz, Malgorzata
    DESALINATION, 2006, 198 (1-3) : 149 - 157