An open-label, long-term study examining the safety and tolerability of pregabalin in Japanese patients with central neuropathic pain

被引:31
作者
Onouchi, Kenji [1 ]
Koga, Hiroaki [2 ]
Yokoyama, Kazumasa [3 ]
Yoshiyama, Tamotsu [4 ]
机构
[1] Aida Mem Rehabil Hosp, Moriya, Ibaraki 3020112, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Rehabil Hosp, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Tokyo 113, Japan
[4] Pfizer Japan Inc, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
clinical trial; spinal cord injury; multiple sclerosis; cerebral stroke; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTERFERENCE; PREVALENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S63028
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Studies of pregabalin for the treatment of central neuropathic pain have been limited to double-blind trials of 4-17 weeks in duration. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of pregabalin in Japanese patients with central neuropathic pain. The efficacy of pregabalin was also assessed as a secondary measure. Patients and methods: This was a 53-week, multicenter, open-label trial of pregabalin (150-600 mg/day) in Japanese patients with central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral stroke. Results: A total of 103 patients received pregabalin (post-stroke = 60; spinal cord injury = 38; and multiple sclerosis = 5). A majority of patients (87.4%) experienced one or more treatment-related adverse events, most commonly somnolence, weight gain, dizziness, or peripheral edema. The adverse event profile was similar to that seen in other indications of pregabalin. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild (89.1%) or moderate (9.2%) in intensity. Pregabalin treatment improved total score, sensory pain, affective pain, visual analog scale (VAS), and present pain intensity scores on the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and ten-item modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI-10) total score at endpoint compared with baseline. Improvements in SF-MPQ VAS and mBPI-10 total scores were evident in all patient subpopulations. Mean changes from baseline in SF-MPQ VAS and mBPI-10 scores at endpoint were -20.1 and -1.4, respectively. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that pregabalin is generally well tolerated and provides sustained efficacy over a 53-week treatment period in patients with chronic central neuropathic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 447
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   INCIDENCE OF CENTRAL POSTSTROKE PAIN [J].
ANDERSEN, G ;
VESTERGAARD, K ;
INGEMANNIELSEN, M ;
JENSEN, TS .
PAIN, 1995, 61 (02) :187-193
[2]   A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury [J].
Cardenas, Diana D. ;
Nieshoff, Edward C. ;
Suda, Kota ;
Goto, Shin-ichi ;
Sanin, Luis ;
Kaneko, Takehiko ;
Sporn, Jonathan ;
Parsons, Bruce ;
Soulsby, Matt ;
Yang, Ruoyong ;
Whalen, Ed ;
Scavone, Joseph M. ;
Suzuki, Makoto M. ;
Knapp, Lloyd E. .
NEUROLOGY, 2013, 80 (06) :533-539
[3]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE WISCONSIN BRIEF PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS PAIN IN CANCER AND OTHER DISEASES [J].
DAUT, RL ;
CLEELAND, CS ;
FLANERY, RC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (02) :197-210
[4]   Safety and efficacy of pregabalin in patients with central post-stroke pain [J].
Kim, Jong S. ;
Bashford, Guy ;
Murphy, T. Kevin ;
Martin, Andrew ;
Dror, Vardit ;
Cheung, Raymond .
PAIN, 2011, 152 (05) :1018-1023
[5]   Central post-stroke pain: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management [J].
Klit, Henriette ;
Finnerup, Nanna B. ;
Jensen, Troels S. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2009, 8 (09) :857-868
[6]  
KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
[7]   THE SHORT-FORM MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1987, 30 (02) :191-197
[8]  
Ogawa Setsuro, 2010, Masui, V59, P961
[9]   Central pain in multiple sclerosis -: prevalence and clinical characteristics [J].
Österberg, A ;
Boivie, J ;
Thuomas, KÅ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 9 (05) :531-542
[10]   Efficacy and safety of pregabalin in patients with spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis [J].
Parsons, Bruce ;
Sanin, Luis ;
Yang, Ruoyong ;
Emir, Birol ;
Juhn, Mark .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (12) :1675-1683