Integration of digital dental casts in cone beam computed tomography scans-a clinical validation study

被引:28
作者
Rangel, Frits A. [1 ]
Maal, Thomas J. J. [2 ]
de Koning, Martien J. J. [2 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. [3 ]
Berge, Stefaan J. [2 ]
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Orthodont & Craniofacial Biol, Dent 309, POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Orthodontics; Oral and maxillofacial surgery; Imaging; Three-dimensional; Three-dimensional imaging; Computer-assisted; Digital dental casts; PLANNING ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MODELS; SIMULATION; ACCURACY; FUSION; IMAGES; DENTITION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-017-2203-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Images derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans lack detailed information on the dentition and interocclusal relationships needed for proper surgical planning and production of surgical splints. To get a proper representation of the dentition, integration of a digital dental model into the CBCT scan is necessary. The aim of this study was to validate a simplified protocol to integrate digital dental models into CBCT scans using only one scan. Conventional protocol A used one combined upper and lower impression and two CBCT scans. The new protocol B included placement of ten markers on the gingiva, one CBCT scan, and two separate impressions of the upper and lower dentition. Twenty consecutive patients, scheduled for mandibular advancement surgery, were included. To validate protocol B, 3-dimensional reconstructions were made, which were compared by calculating the mean intersurface distances obtained with both protocols. The mean distance for all patients for the upper jaw is 0.39 mm and for the lower jaw is 0.30 mm. For ten out of 20 patients, all distances were less than 1 mm. For the other ten patients, all distances were less than 2 mm. Mean distances of 0.39 and 0.30 mm are clinically acceptable and comparable to other studies; therefore, this new protocol is clinically accurate. This new protocol seems to be clinically accurate. It is less time consuming, gives less radiation exposure for the patient, and has a lower risk for positional errors of the impressions compared to other integration protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1222
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A novel approach for planning orthognathic surgery: The integration of dental casts into three-dimensional printed mandibular models
    Ayoub, A. F.
    Rehab, M.
    O'Neil, M.
    Khambay, B.
    Ju, X.
    Barbenel, J.
    Naudi, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (04) : 454 - 459
  • [2] Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery Using Digital Data Transfer and an Intraoral Fiducial Marker: The Charlotte Method
    Bobek, Sam
    Farrell, Brian
    Choi, Chris
    Farrell, Bart
    Weimer, Katie
    Tucker, Myron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (06) : 1143 - 1158
  • [3] Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: A validation study
    Cuperus, Anne Margreet R.
    Harms, Marit C.
    Rangel, Frits A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Schols, Jan G. J. H.
    Breuning, K. Hero
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (03) : 308 - 313
  • [4] Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review
    De Luca Canto, G.
    Pacheco-Pereira, C.
    Lagravere, M. O.
    Flores-Mir, C.
    Major, P. W.
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (02) : 65 - 76
  • [5] Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts
    de Waard, Olivier
    Rangel, Frits Andreas
    Fudalej, Piotr Stanislaw
    Bronkhorst, Ewald Maria
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
    Breuning, Karel Hero
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 146 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [6] Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review
    Fleming, P. S.
    Marinho, V.
    Johal, A.
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [7] Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine - An in vitro study
    Fortin, T
    Champleboux, G
    Bianchi, S
    Buatois, H
    Coudert, FL
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (06) : 651 - 656
  • [8] A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model
    Gateno, J
    Xia, J
    Teichgraeber, JF
    Rosen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 61 (02) : 222 - 227
  • [9] Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex craniomaxillofacial deformities
    Gateno, Jaime
    Xia, James J.
    Teichgraeber, John F.
    Christensen, Andrew M.
    Lemoine, Jeremy J.
    Liebschner, Michael A. K.
    Gliddon, Michael J.
    Briggs, Michaelanne E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (04) : 728 - 734
  • [10] Incidence of hypertrophic and keloid scars after N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive had been used to close parotidectomy wounds: A prospective study of 100 consecutive patients
    Greenhill, Gillian A.
    O'Regan, Barry
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 47 (04) : 290 - 293