STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS

被引:575
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
Kildiene, Simona [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Construct Technol & Management, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Multiple Objective Decision Making (MODM); overview; ISI Web of Science databases; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; MCDM METHODS; SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEMS; MOORA METHOD; CLASSIFICATION; CONSTRUCTION; DESIGN; ENERGY; INTELLIGENT;
D O I
10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Decision-making is primarily a process that involves different actors: people, groups of people, institutions and the state. As a discipline, multi-criteria decision-making has a relatively short history. Since 1950s and 1960s, when foundations of modern multi-criteria decision-making methods have been laid, many researches devoted their time to development of new multi-criteria decision-making models and techniques. In the past decades, researches and development in the field have accelerated and seem to continue growing exponentially. Despite the intensive development worldwide, few attempts have been made to systematically present the theoretical bases and developments of multi-criteria decision-making methods. However, the methodological choices and framework for assessment of decisions are still under discussion. The article describes the situation with reviews of MCDM/MADM methods. Furthermore, there is a need for research to study the strengths and weaknesses of different decision-making methods.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 179
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context [J].
Adler, N ;
Friedman, L ;
Sinuany-Stern, Z .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (02) :249-265
[2]   A framework for concurrent material and process selection during conceptual product design stages [J].
Albinana, J. C. ;
Vila, C. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2012, 41 :433-446
[3]  
Aliasi MA., 2008, Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat, V20, P129
[4]   A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Herath, Gamini .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) :2535-2548
[5]  
[Anonymous], MULTICRITERIA DECISI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis : State of the art Surveys, DOI DOI 10.1007/b100605
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[8]  
[Anonymous], J MULTICRIT IN PRESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D
[10]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURE INFRASTRUC