Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements

被引:149
作者
Hebart, Martin N. [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Charles Y. [3 ]
Pereira, Francisco [3 ]
Baker, Chris I. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIMH, Lab Brain & Cognit, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Vis & Computat Cognit Grp, Leipzig, Germany
[3] NIMH, Machine Learning Core, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SEMANTIC SPACE; KNOWLEDGE; CATEGORIZATION; BRAIN; DISTANCE; FEATURES; STIMULUS;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-020-00951-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Hebart et al. developed a computational model of similarity judgements for 1,854 natural objects. The model accurately predicted similarity and revealed 49 interpretable dimensions that reflect both perceptual and conceptual object properties. Objects can be characterized according to a vast number of possible criteria (such as animacy, shape, colour and function), but some dimensions are more useful than others for making sense of the objects around us. To identify these core dimensions of object representations, we developed a data-driven computational model of similarity judgements for real-world images of 1,854 objects. The model captured most explainable variance in similarity judgements and produced 49 highly reproducible and meaningful object dimensions that reflect various conceptual and perceptual properties of those objects. These dimensions predicted external categorization behaviour and reflected typicality judgements of those categories. Furthermore, humans can accurately rate objects along these dimensions, highlighting their interpretability and opening up a way to generate similarity estimates from object dimensions alone. Collectively, these results demonstrate that human similarity judgements can be captured by a fairly low-dimensional, interpretable embedding that generalizes to external behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ICLR 2015 C TRACK P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, P 2016 C EMNLP, DOI [DOI 10.18653/V1/D16-1174, 10.18653/v1/D16-1174]
[4]   The temporal evolution of conceptual object representations revealed through models of behavior, semantics and deep neural networks [J].
Bankson, B. B. ;
Hebart, M. N. ;
Groen, I. I. A. ;
Baker, C., I .
NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 178 :172-182
[5]   CONTEXT-INDEPENDENT AND CONTEXT-DEPENDENT INFORMATION IN CONCEPTS [J].
BARSALOU, LW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1982, 10 (01) :82-93
[6]  
Bauer A. J., 2019, OXFORD HDB NEUROLING, P518
[7]   RECOGNITION-BY-COMPONENTS - A THEORY OF HUMAN IMAGE UNDERSTANDING [J].
BIEDERMAN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :115-147
[8]   Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation [J].
Binder, Jeffrey R. ;
Conant, Lisa L. ;
Humphries, Colin J. ;
Fernandino, Leonardo ;
Simons, Stephen B. ;
Aguilar, Mario ;
Desai, Rutvik H. .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 33 (3-4) :130-174
[9]   Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction [J].
Caramazza, A ;
Shelton, JR .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (01) :1-34
[10]   Reaction Time for Object Categorization Is Predicted by Representational Distance [J].
Carlson, Thomas A. ;
Ritchie, J. Brendan ;
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ;
Durvasula, Samir ;
Ma, Junsheng .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 26 (01) :132-142