Five years of specialised early intervention versus two years of specialised early intervention followed by three years of standard treatment for patients with a first episode psychosis: randomised, superiority, parallel group trial in Denmark (OPUS II)

被引:42
作者
Albert, Nikolai [1 ]
Melau, Marianne [1 ]
Jensen, Heidi [1 ]
Emborg, Charlotte [3 ]
Mollegaard, Jens Richardt [4 ]
Fagerlund, Birgitte [4 ]
Gluud, Christian [5 ]
Mors, Ole [2 ]
Hjorthoj, Carsten [1 ]
Nordentoft, Merete [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Mental Hlth Ctr Copenhagen, Res Unit, Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Psychosis Res Unit, Risskov, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Sect P, Psychosis Ward, Risskov, Denmark
[4] Ctr Clin Intervent & Neuropsychiat Schizophrenia, Glostrup, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2017年 / 356卷
关键词
1ST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MULTICENTER TRIAL; SCHIZOPHRENIA; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM; PSYCHOEDUCATION; ANTIPSYCHOTICS; VALIDATION; RATIONALE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.i6681
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the effects of five years of specialised early intervention (SEI) treatment for first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder with the standard two years of SEI plus three years of treatment as usual. Design Randomised, superiority, parallel group trial with blinded outcome assessment. Randomisation was centralised and computerised with concealed randomisation sequence carried out at an external site. Setting Participants were recruited from six OPUS teams in Denmark between 2009 and 2012. OPUS teams provide SEI treatment to all patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder in Denmark. Participants 400 participants (51% women) with a mean age of 25.6 (standard deviation 4.3) were randomised to five years of SEI (experimental intervention; n=197) or to two years of SEI plus three years of treatment as usual (control; n=203). Interventions OPUS treatment consists of three core elements-modified assertive community treatment, family involvement, and social skill training-with a patient-case manager ratio of no more than 12:1. For participants randomised to five years of OPUS treatment, the treatment was largely unchanged. Participants randomised to the control group were mostly referred to community health centres after two years of SEI treatment. Main outcomes Follow-up assessments were conducted five years after start of OPUS treatment. Primary outcome was negative symptoms measured on the scale for assessment of negative symptoms (avolition-apathy, anhedonia, alogia, and affective blunting). Secondary outcomes were remission of both negative and psychotic symptoms, psychotic symptoms, suicidal ideation, substance abuse, compliance with medical treatment, adherence with treatment, client satisfaction, days in hospital care, and labour market affiliation. Results Levels of negative symptoms did not differ between the intervention group and control group (1.72 v 1.81 points; estimated mean difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.13), P=0.39). Participants receiving five years of OPUS treatment were more likely to remain in contact with specialised mental health services (90.4% v 55.6%, P<0.001), had higher client satisfaction (estimated mean difference 2.57 points (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 3.79), P<0.001), and had a stronger working alliance (estimated mean difference 5.56 points (95% confidence interval 2.30 to 8.82), P=0.001) than the control group. Conclusions This trial tests SEI treatment for up to five years for patients with first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder; previous trials have found treatment effects for programmes lasting from one to three years. The prolonged SEI treatment had few effects, which could be due to the high level of treatment provided to control participants and the late start of specialised treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[61]  
Wing JK., 1998, WHO DIAGNOSIS CLIN M, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511666445, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511666445]
[62]   Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes:: meta-epidemiological study [J].
Wood, Lesley ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Gluud, Lise Lotte ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Jueni, Peter ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Martin, Richard M. ;
Wood, Anthony J. G. ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7644) :601-605
[63]  
World Health Organization, 1993, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research
[64]  
World Health Organization collaborating centre Drug Statistics Methodology, 2016, ATC CLASSIFICATIONS