Single/two-objective aerodynamic shape optimization by a Stackelberg/adjoint method

被引:10
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jianjun [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Fangfang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jifa [1 ,2 ]
Periaux, Jaques [3 ]
Tang, Zhili [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Engn & Sci Computat, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Int Ctr Numer Methods Engn CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Aerosp Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stackelberg; adjoint method; Stackelberg game; multi-objective optimization; GAME-THEORY; DESIGN; STRATEGIES; MULTIPOINT;
D O I
10.1080/0305215X.2019.1618287
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this article, the Stackelberg game strategy is coupled with the adjoint method and applied in single-objective and two-objective aerodynamic shape optimizations. In the proposed method, two types of player (leader and follower) are involved, and each of these players is responsible for the optimization of one objective function by adjusting a subset of design variables. A Stackelberg equilibrium is reached when the leader cannot improve his/her objective function further. Note that the success of the proposed method is highly dependent on the choice of a few influential factors, including the maximal number of iterations for each player, the splitting and mapping schemes of design variables, and the allocation strategies of objective functions to different players. Therefore, the impacts of these factors are firstly assessed by a two-objective optimization case of the NACA0012 airfoil, and some useful inferences are produced for the choice of these factors. After that, single-objective and two-objective aerodynamic optimizations of the RAE2822 airfoil and the ONERA M6 wing are conducted to verify the usefulness of these inferences, and to validate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method in optimization problems with a complex numerical model or a large number of design variables.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 776
页数:24
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, DFVLRFB8828
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, VKI LECT SERIES AERO
[3]  
[Anonymous], RR3686 INRIA
[4]   A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization [J].
Athan, TW ;
Papalambros, PY .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 27 (02) :155-176
[5]  
Aubin J.-P., 2007, MATH METHODS GAME EC
[6]  
Bauso D., 2016, Game theory with engineering applications
[7]   Continuous Adjoint Approach for the Spalart-Allmaras Model in Aerodynamic Optimization [J].
Bueno-Orovio, Alfonso ;
Castro, Carlos ;
Palacios, Francisco ;
Zuazua, Enrique .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (03) :631-646
[8]  
Cook P. H., 1977, AEROFOIL RAE2822 PRE
[9]  
Deb K., 2000, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. 6th International Conference. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.1917), P849
[10]   WING DESIGN BY NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION [J].
HICKS, RM ;
HENNE, PA .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1978, 15 (07) :407-412