Recommendations for Internet-Based Qualitative Health Research With Hard-to-Reach Populations

被引:89
作者
Wilkerson, J. Michael [1 ]
Iantaffi, Alex [2 ]
Grey, Jeremy A. [3 ]
Bockting, Walter O. [4 ,5 ]
Rosser, B. R. Simon [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Div Hlth Promot & Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, LGBT Hlth, Div Gender Sexual & Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, HIV STI Intervent & Prevent Studies, Minneapolis, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gays and lesbians; gender; Internet; research; qualitative; teaching; learning strategies; technology; use in research; FOCUS GROUPS; ONLINE; FACE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/1049732314524635
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Researchers new to online qualitative health research frequently have questions about how to transfer knowledge of offline data collection to an online environment. In this article, we present best-practice guidelines derived from the literature and our experience to help researchers determine if an online qualitative study design is appropriate for their research project and, if so, when to begin data collection with a hard-to-reach population. Researchers should reflect on administrative, population, and data collection considerations when deciding between online and offline data collection. Decisions must be made regarding whether to conduct interviews or focus groups, to collect data using asynchronous or synchronous methods, and to use only text or to incorporate visual media. Researchers should also reflect on human subjects, recruitment, research instrumentation, additional data collection, and public relations considerations when writing protocols to guide the research team's response to various situations. Our recommendations direct researchers' reflection on these considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 574
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The "virtual focus group": Using the Internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest
    Adler, CL
    Zarchin, YR
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2002, 31 (04): : 418 - 427
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, AD CONN VERS 9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, NVIVO VERS 8
  • [4] Evaluating Internet Interviews With Gay Men
    Ayling, Russel
    Mewse, Avril J.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (04) : 566 - 576
  • [5] Community-academic research on hard-to-reach populations: Benefits and challenges
    Benoit, C
    Jansson, M
    Millar, A
    Phillips, R
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (02) : 263 - 282
  • [6] Brackertz Nicola., 2007, Who Is Hard to Reach and Why? I
  • [7] Health behavior changes after colon cancer: A comparison of findings from face-to-face and on-line focus groups
    Campbell, MK
    Meier, A
    Carr, C
    Enga, Z
    James, AS
    Reedy, J
    Zheng, B
    [J]. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) : 88 - 103
  • [8] Chang H., 2008, Autoethnography as method
  • [9] Going beyond our limits: Issues for able and disabled students
    Clark, Gordon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (01) : 211 - 218
  • [10] Denzin N. K., 2017, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, V5th