High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)

被引：277

作者：

Gettelman, A. ^{[1
]}

Hannay, C. ^{[1
]}

Bacmeister, J. T. ^{[1
]}

Neale, R. B. ^{[1
]}

Pendergrass, A. G. ^{[1
]}

Danabasoglu, G. ^{[1
]}

Lamarque, J-F ^{[1
]}

Fasullo, J. T. ^{[1
]}

Bailey, D. A. ^{[1
]}

Lawrence, D. M. ^{[1
]}

Mills, M. J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA

来源：

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2019年 / 46卷 / 14期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

climate sensitivity; climate models; WATER-VAPOR FEEDBACK; CLOUD FEEDBACKS; ICE-NUCLEATION; REACTIVE GASES; PARAMETERIZATION; AEROSOLS; IMPACT; MICROPHYSICS; SIMULATIONS; EMISSIONS;

D O I：

10.1029/2019GL083978

中图分类号：

P [天文学、地球科学];

学科分类号：

07 ;

摘要：

The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) has an equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 5.3K. ECS is an emergent property of both climate feedbacks and aerosol forcing. The increase in ECS over the previous version (CESM1) is the result of cloud feedbacks. Interim versions of CESM2 had a land model that damped ECS. Part of the ECS change results from evolving the model configuration to reproduce the long-term trend of global and regional surface temperature over the twentieth century in response to climate forcings. Changes made to reduce sensitivity to aerosols also impacted cloud feedbacks, which significantly influence ECS. CESM2 simulations compare very well to observations of present climate. It is critical to understand whether the high ECS, outside the best estimate range of 1.5-4.5K, is plausible.

引用

页码：8329 / 8337

页数：9

共 58 条

[1] The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing
Ackerman, AS
Kirkpatrick, MP
Stevens, DE
Toon, OB
[J]. NATURE, 2004, 432 (7020) : 1014 - 1017
[2] AEROSOLS, CLOUD MICROPHYSICS, AND FRACTIONAL CLOUDINESS
ALBRECHT, BA
[J]. SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4923) : 1227 - 1230
[3] [Anonymous], 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
[4] Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model
Bogenschutz, Peter A.
Gettelman, Andrew
Morrison, Hugh
Larson, Vincent E.
Craig, Cheryl
Schanen, David P.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (23) : 9655 - 9676
[5] How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?
Bony, Sandrine
Colman, Robert
Kattsov, Vladimir M.
Allan, Richard P.
Bretherton, Christopher S.
Dufresne, Jean-Louis
Hall, Alex
Hallegatte, Stephane
Holland, Marika M.
Ingram, William
Randall, David A.
Soden, Brian J.
Tselioudis, George
Webb, Mark J.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (15) : 3445 - 3482
[6] Boucher O, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P571, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324.016
[7] SCIENCE AND STATISTICS
BOX, GEP
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (356) : 791 - 799
[8] Water vapor feedback in climate models
Cess, RD
[J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5749) : 795 - 796
[9] INTERPRETATION OF CLOUD-CLIMATE FEEDBACK AS PRODUCED BY 14 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
CESS, RD
POTTER, GL
BLANCHET, JP
BOER, GJ
GHAN, SJ
KIEHL, JT
LETREUT, H
LI, ZX
LIANG, XZ
MITCHELL, JFB
MORCRETTE, JJ
RANDALL, DA
RICHES, MR
ROECKNER, E
SCHLESE, U
SLINGO, A
TAYLOR, KE
WASHINGTON, WM
WETHERALD, RT
YAGAI, I
[J]. SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4917) : 513 - 516
[10] INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
CESS, RD
POTTER, GL
BLANCHET, JP
BOER, GJ
DELGENIO, AD
DEQUE, M
DYMNIKOV, V
GALIN, V
GATES, WL
GHAN, SJ
KIEHL, JT
LACIS, AA
LETREUT, H
LI, ZX
LIANG, XZ
MCAVANEY, BJ
MELESHKO, VP
MITCHELL, JFB
MORCRETTE, JJ
RANDALL, DA
RIKUS, L
ROECKNER, E
ROYER, JF
SCHLESE, U
SHEININ, DA
SLINGO, A
SOKOLOV, AP
TAYLOR, KE
WASHINGTON, WM
WETHERALD, RT
YAGAI, I
ZHANG, MH
[J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) : 16601 - 16615

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →