Multi-scale sample entropy of electroencephalography during sevoflurane anesthesia

被引:21
作者
Wang, Yinghua [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Zhenhu [3 ]
Voss, Logan J. [4 ]
Sleigh, Jamie W. [4 ]
Li, Xiaoli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, IDG McGovern Inst Brain Res, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Collaborat & Innovat Brain & Learning Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Yanshan Univ, Inst Elect Engn, Qinhuangdao 066004, Peoples R China
[4] Waikato Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Hamilton, New Zealand
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electroencephalography; Anesthesia; Multi-scale analysis; Sample entropy; SPECTRAL ENTROPY; BISPECTRAL INDEX; APPROXIMATE ENTROPY; PERMUTATION ENTROPY; EEG COMPLEXITY; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-014-9550-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The electroencephalogram (EEG) has been widely applied in the assessment of depth of anesthesia (DoA). Recent research has found that multi-scale EEG analysis describes brain dynamics better than traditional non-linear methods. In this study, we have adopted a modified sample entropy (MSpEn) method to analyze anesthetic EEG series as a measure of DoA. EEG data from a previous study consisting of 19 adult subjects undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia were used in the present investigation. In addition to the modified sample entropy method, the well-established EEG indices approximate entropy (ApEn), response entropy (RE), and state entropy (SE) were also computed for comparison. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and prediction probability (P (k) ) were used to assess and compare the performance of the four methods for tracking anesthetic concentration. The influence of the number of scales on MSpEn was also investigated using a linear regression model. MSpEn correlated closely with anesthetic effect. The P (k) (0.83 +/- A 0.05, mean +/- A SD) and the coefficient of determination R (2) (0.87 +/- A 0.21) for the relationship between MSpEn and sevoflurane effect site concentration were highest for MSpEn (P (k) : RE = 0.73 +/- A 0.08, SE = 0.72 +/- A 0.07, ApEn = 0.81 +/- A 0.04; R (2): RE = 0.75 +/- A 0.08, SE = 0.64 +/- A 0.09, ApEn = 0.81 +/- A 0.10). Scales 1, 3 and 5 tended to make the greatest contribution to MSpEn. For this data set, the MSpEn is superior to the ApEn, the RE and the SE for tracking drug concentration change during sevoflurane anesthesia. It is suggested that the MSpEn may be further studied for application in clinical monitoring of DoA.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 417
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   EEG complexity as a biomarker for autism spectrum disorder risk [J].
Bosl, William ;
Tierney, Adrienne ;
Tager-Flusberg, Helen ;
Nelson, Charles .
BMC MEDICINE, 2011, 9
[2]   Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: what's available, what's validated and what's next? [J].
Bruhn, J. ;
Myles, P. S. ;
Sneyd, R. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (01) :85-94
[3]   Electroencephalogram approximate entropy correctly classifies the occurrence of burst suppression pattern as increasing anesthetic drug effect [J].
Bruhn, J ;
Röpcke, H ;
Rehberg, B ;
Bouillon, T ;
Hoeft, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (04) :981-985
[4]  
Cao YH, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046217
[5]   Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals [J].
Costa, M ;
Goldberger, AL ;
Peng, CK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 71 (02)
[6]   Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series [J].
Costa, M ;
Goldberger, AL ;
Peng, CK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (06) :1-068102
[7]   EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[8]  
Ellerkmann RK, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, P1275
[9]   Analysis of electroencephalograms in Alzheimer's disease patients with multiscale entropy [J].
Escudero, J. ;
Abasolo, D. ;
Hornero, R. ;
Espino, P. ;
Lopez, M. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 27 (11) :1091-1106
[10]   Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery [J].
Jameson L.C. ;
Sloan T.B. .
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2006, 20 (6) :445-472