Assessment of the use of adrenaline auto-injectors among a logia bez u i 1 adult patients at risk of anaphylaxis

被引:0
作者
Ozdemir, Ebru [1 ]
Damadoglu, Ebru [1 ]
Karakaya, Gul [1 ]
Kalyoncu, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Chest Dis, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
adrenaline auto-injectors; training; carriage; anaphylaxis; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.5114/pja.2022.119231
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Carriage and correct use of adrenaline auto-injectors (AAIs) by patients have been reported to be low. Aim: To evaluate the carriage rate of the EpiPen degrees and the usage skills of the adult patients. Material and methods: A total of 46 patients who had been previously prescribed EpiPen degrees were enrolled during a five-month period in our clinic. Data about the EpiPen degrees prescription indications and prescription date, the number of the device usage training sessions, the last training date, and the reasons for not carrying the device were obtained. Patients were practically evaluated with a trainer device. Results: Among 46 patients, 20 (43%) were female, and the mean age of the patients was 45 +/- 13 years (min.-max.: 20-67). EpiPen degrees prescription indication included Hymenoptera venom allergy in 44 patients, food allergy in one patient, and idiopathic anaphylaxis in one patient. Twenty-nine (63%) patients reported that they kept the device with them always, whereas 17 (37%) reported they did not. The most frequently stated reason for not carrying an EpiPen degrees was the thought that it was unnecessary (n = 6, 35%). Of 29 patients, 11 (38%) correctly demonstrated all the steps of the trainer device. The most frequent mistake was failing to remove the cap (n = 15, 83%). Conclusions: The significance of always carrying the device at all times should be emphasized, as should the importance of correct use of the device in patients' routine controls. Trainings given at least twice a year may be supported by reminders via telephone call or e-mail.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis
    Simons, F. Estelle R.
    Ardusso, Ledit R. F.
    Bilo, M. Beatrice
    Cardona, Victoria
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    El-Gamal, Yehia M.
    Lieberman, Phil
    Lockey, Richard F.
    Muraro, Antonella
    Roberts, Graham
    Sanchez-Borges, Mario
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Shek, Lynette P.
    Wallace, Dana V.
    Worm, Margitta
    [J]. WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2014, 7
  • [12] Anaphylaxis treatment: current barriers to adrenaline auto-injector use
    Song, T. T.
    Worm, M.
    Lieberman, P.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2014, 69 (08) : 983 - 991
  • [13] Epidemiology of anaphylaxis
    Tejedor Alonso, M. A.
    Moro Moro, M.
    Mugica Garcia, M. V.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2015, 45 (06) : 1027 - 1039
  • [14] A Real-Life Study on Acquired Skills from Using an Adrenaline Autoinjector
    Topal, Erdem
    Bakirtas, Arzu
    Yilmaz, Ozlem
    Ertoy, Ilbilge Hacer
    Arga, Mustafa
    Demirsoy, Mehmet Sadik
    Turktas, Ipek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 160 (03) : 301 - 306
  • [15] Epinephrine auto-injector carriage and use practices among US children, adolescents, and adults
    Warren, Christopher M.
    Zaslaysky, Justin M.
    Kan, Kristin
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    Gupta, Ruchi S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 121 (04) : 479 - +