Comparison of performance in a four year graduate entry medical programme and a traditional five/six year programme

被引:9
作者
Byrne, Annette T. [1 ]
Arnett, Richard [2 ]
Farrell, Tom [1 ]
Sreenan, Seamus [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Grad Entry Programme, Dublin 18, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Qual Enhancement Off, Dublin 2, Ireland
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Graduate entry medicine outcomes; STUDENTS; SCHOOL; UNDERGRADUATE; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-014-0248-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: In 2006 the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, (RCSI), introduced the first four year Graduate Entry Programme (GEP) in medicine in Ireland in line with national policy to broaden access to medical education. One concern considered at the time, was whether the GEP students could be trained to the same standard as their undergraduate Direct Entry Programme (DEP, five/six year duration) counterparts in the shorter time frame. Since students from both cohorts undertake the same examinations in the final two years, it is possible to directly compare GEP vs DEP outcomes. The primary aim of the current study was to analyse the comparative performance of GEP and DEP students undergoing these examinations between 2008 and 2013. Methods: Scores from five assessments performed during the final two years were transformed to z scores for each student and 4 scores for the penultimate year were summed to create a unit weighted composite score. The resultant scores for each of the two years were used to assess the comparative performance of GEP vs DEP cohorts and to perform sub-cohort analyses of GEP outcomes. Results: In all cohorts/years examined, evidence demonstrated significantly better assessment outcomes for the GEP group for the final two years' examinations as compared with the DEP group. In all but one cohort examined, this advantage was retained when nationality factors were excluded. Further analyses showed no difference in outcomes between GEP students having science vs. non-science backgrounds and/or between those from EU vs non-EU backgrounds. Finally, data suggested weak correlations between total composite scores and entry scores in American (r = 0.15) and Australian (r = 0.08) medical school admissions tests. Conclusions: We have shown for the first time in Ireland, that graduate-entry students perform at least as well, or even better, than a corresponding undergraduate-entry group. Moreover, having a scientific background on entry to the GEP confers no advantage in final assessments. These data provide evidence of the viability of the graduate entry route into medical education in Ireland.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Examination performance of graduate entry medical students compared with mainstream students
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Ross, Nick M.
    Freemantle, Nick
    Xu, Yong
    Zvauya, Remigio
    Parle, Jim V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2009, 102 (10) : 425 - 430
  • [2] Prior academic background and student performance in assessment in a graduate entry programme
    Craig, PL
    Gordon, JJ
    Clark, RM
    Langendyk, V
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (11) : 1164 - 1168
  • [3] Comparing the academic performance of graduate- and undergraduate-entry medical students
    Dodds, Agnes E.
    Reid, Katharine J.
    Conn, Jennifer J.
    Elliott, Susan L.
    McColl, Geoffrey J.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (02) : 197 - 204
  • [4] Selecting the future doctors: the role of graduate medical programmes
    Elliott, SL
    Epstein, J
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 35 (03) : 174 - 177
  • [5] COMPARISON OF MEDICAL-SCHOOL PERFORMANCES AND CAREER PLANS OF STUDENTS WITH BROAD AND WITH SCIENCE-FOCUSED PREMEDICAL PREPARATION
    KOENIG, JA
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1992, 67 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [6] Comparative attainment of 5-year undergraduate and 4-year graduate entry medical students moving into foundation training
    Manning, Gillian
    Garrud, Paul
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 9
  • [7] Miflin Barbara, 2003, Med Teach, V25, P109
  • [8] Are graduate entry programmes the answer to recruiting and selecting tomorrow's doctors?
    Powis, D
    Hamilton, J
    Gordon, J
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (11) : 1147 - 1153
  • [9] The Consortium of Graduate Medical Schools in Australia: formal and informal collaboration in medical education
    Prideaux, D
    Teubner, J
    Sefton, A
    Field, M
    Gordon, J
    Price, D
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2000, 34 (06) : 449 - 454
  • [10] Clinical assessment performance of graduate- and undergraduate-entry medical students
    Reid, Katharine J.
    Dodds, Agnes E.
    McColl, Geoffrey J.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (02) : 168 - 171