Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

被引:28
|
作者
Daeichin, Verya [1 ,4 ,5 ]
van Rooij, Tom [1 ]
Skachkov, Ilya [1 ,2 ]
Ergin, Bulent [7 ]
Specht, Patricia A. C. [8 ]
Lima, Alexandre [6 ]
Ince, Can [6 ,7 ]
Bosch, Johan G. [1 ]
van der Steen, Antonius F. W. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
de Jong, Nico [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Kooiman, Klazina [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Ctr Thorax, Dept Biomed Engn, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Imaging Div, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Lab Acoust Wavefield Imaging, Fac Sci Appl, NL-2628 CJ Delft, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Heart Inst, NL-3511 EP Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus MC, Dept Intens Care Adults, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Translat Physiol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Erasmus MC, Dept Anesthesiol, Lab Expt Anesthesiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Contrast agent; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging; high-frequency; in vitro; in vivo; microbubble; LIPID-COATED MICROBUBBLES; PHOSPHOLIPID ENCAPSULATED MICROBUBBLES; MICRO-ULTRASOUND; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES; TARGETED MICROBUBBLES; SUBHARMONIC RESPONSE; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; AGENTS; BEHAVIOR; SIZE;
D O I
10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Although high-frequency ultrasound imaging is gaining attention in various applications, hardly any ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) dedicated to such frequencies (>15 MHz) are available for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Moreover, the composition of the limited commercially available UCAs for high-frequency CEUS (hfCEUS) is largely unknown, while shell properties have been shown to be an important factor for their performance. The aim of our study was to produce UCAs in-house for hfCEUS. Twelve different UCA formulations A-L were made by either sonication or mechanical agitation. The gas core consisted of C4F10 and the main coating lipid was either 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC; A-F formulation) or 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC; G-L formulation). Mechanical agitation resulted in UCAs with smaller microbubbles (number weighted mean diameter similar to 1 mu m) than sonication (number weighted mean diameter similar to 2 mu m). UCA formulations with similar size distributions but different main lipid components showed that the DPPC-based UCA formulations had higher nonlinear responses at both the fundamental and subharmonic frequencies in vitro for hfCEUS using the Vevo2100 high-frequency preclinical scanner (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). In addition, UCA formulations F (DSPC-based) and L (DPPC-based) that were made by mechanical agitation performed similar in vitro to the commercially available TargetReady MicroMarker (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). UCA formulation F also performed similar to Target-Ready MicroMarker in vivo in pigs with similar mean contrast intensity within the kidney (n = 7), but formulation L did not. This is likely due to the lower stability of formulation L in vivo. Our study shows that DSPC-based microbubbles produced by mechanical agitation resulted in small microbubbles with high nonlinear responses suitable for hfCEUS imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 567
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The preparation and application of microbubble contrast agent combining ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging
    Yang Fang
    Li YiXin
    Chen ZhongPing
    Gu Ning
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2009, 54 (17): : 2934 - 2939
  • [42] Influence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound administration setups on microbubble enhancement: a focus on pediatric applications
    Michael R. Kramer
    Nishi Bhagat
    Susan J. Back
    Laura Poznick
    Flemming Forsberg
    Kassa Darge
    John R. Eisenbrey
    Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 : 101 - 108
  • [43] Radial modulation imaging of microbubble contrast agents at high frequency
    Cherin, Emmanuel
    Brown, Jeremy
    Masoy, Svein-Erik
    Shariff, Hamid
    Karshafian, Raffi
    Williams, Ross
    Burns, Peter N.
    Foster, F. Stuart
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (06) : 949 - 962
  • [44] Neural progenitor cells labeling with microbubble contrast agent for ultrasound imaging in vivo
    Cui, Wenjin
    Tavri, Sidhartha
    Benchimol, Michael J.
    Itani, Malak
    Olson, Emilia S.
    Zhang, Hong
    Decyk, Marika
    Ramirez, Rosemarie G.
    Barback, Christopher V.
    Kono, Yuko
    Mattrey, Robert F.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2013, 34 (21) : 4926 - 4935
  • [45] Ex Vivo Evaluation of Mouse Brain Elasticity Using High-Frequency Ultrasound Elastography
    Lay, Fang-Yi
    Chen, Pei-Yu
    Cheng, Hsiang-Fan
    Kuo, Yu-Min
    Huang, Chih-Chung
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 (12) : 3426 - 3435
  • [46] CORRECTION OF NON-LINEAR PROPAGATION ARTIFACT IN CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF CAROTID ARTERIES: METHODS AND IN VITRO EVALUATION
    Yildiz, Yesna O.
    Eckersley, Robert J.
    Senior, Roxy
    Lim, Adrian K. P.
    Cosgrove, David
    Tang, Meng-Xing
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (07) : 1938 - 1947
  • [47] Improved Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging With Multiplane-Wave Imaging
    Gong, Ping
    Song, Pengfei
    Chen, Shigao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2018, 65 (02) : 178 - 187
  • [48] Epithelial cell biocompatibility of silica nanospheres for contrast-enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging
    Chiriaco, Fernanda
    Conversano, Francesco
    Soloperto, Giulia
    Casciaro, Ernesto
    Ragusa, Andrea
    Sbenaglia, Enzo Antonio
    Dipaola, Lucia
    Casciaro, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (07)
  • [49] Gas-generating nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
    Sun, In-Cheol
    Emelianov, Stanislav
    NANOSCALE, 2019, 11 (35) : 16235 - 16240
  • [50] Counter-propagation interaction for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
    Renaud, G.
    Bosch, J. G.
    de Jong, N.
    van der Steen, A. F. W.
    Shamdasani, V.
    Entrekin, R.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2012,