A systematic review on how to conduct evaluations in community-based rehabilitation

被引:36
作者
Grandisson, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Hebert, Michele [1 ]
Thibeault, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Rehabil, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Occupat Therapy Dept, Trois Rivieres, PQ G9A 5H7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Community-based rehabilitation; evaluation process; framework; methods of data collection; program evaluation; PROGRAMS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2013.785602
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) must prove that it is making a significant difference for people with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries. Yet, evaluation is not a common practice and the evidence for its effectiveness is fragmented and largely insufficient. The objective of this article was to review the literature on best practices in program evaluation in CBR in relation to the evaluative process, the frameworks, and the methods of data collection. Method: A systematic search was conducted on five rehabilitation databases and the World Health Organization website with keywords associated with CBR and program evaluation. Two independent researchers selected the articles. Results: Twenty-two documents were included. The results suggest that (1) the evaluative process needs to be conducted in close collaboration with the local community, including people with disabilities, and to be followed by sharing the findings and taking actions, (2) many frameworks have been proposed to evaluate CBR but no agreement has been reached, and (3) qualitative methodologies have dominated the scene in CBR so far, but their combination with quantitative methods has a lot of potential to better capture the effectiveness of this strategy. Conclusions: In order to facilitate and improve evaluations in CBR, there is an urgent need to agree on a common framework, such as the CBR matrix, and to develop best practice guidelines based on the literature available and consensus among a group of experts. These will need to demonstrate a good balance between community development and standards for effective evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 275
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Developing a tool for evaluating community-based rehabilitation in Uganda [J].
Adeoye, Adewale ;
Seeley, Janet ;
Hartley, Sally .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (13-14) :1110-1124
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MMWR, V48, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PHYTOCHEM.2017.08.009
[4]  
Boyce W., 2000, Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, V2, P69
[5]   AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Browman, George P. ;
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Cluzeau, Francoise ;
Feder, Gene ;
Fervers, Beatrice ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Makarski, Julie ;
Zitzelsberger, Louise .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) :E839-E842
[6]   A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation programmes in Chinese communities [J].
Chung, Eva Yin-Han ;
Packer, Tanya L. ;
Yau, Matthew .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (17-18) :1668-1682
[7]  
Cornielje H, 2000, LEPROSY REV, V71, P472
[8]  
Cornielje H, 2008, LEPROSY REV, V79, P36
[9]   Evaluation of medical rehabilitation in community based rehabilitation [J].
Evans, PJ ;
Zinkin, P ;
Harpham, T ;
Chaudury, G .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 53 (03) :333-348
[10]  
Fetterman DavidM., 2005, EMPOWERMENT EVALUATI