Estimation of the main properties in locking plates design for a proximal humerus fracture with the finite element method and DOE

被引:0
作者
Mendoza-Munoz, I. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Angeles, A. [1 ]
Jacobo-Galicia, G. [1 ]
Lopez-Avitia, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Fac Ingn, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
来源
2017 GLOBAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING PHYSICS EXCHANGES/PAN AMERICAN HEALTH CARE EXCHANGES (GMEPE/PAHCE) | 2017年
关键词
Design of experiments; finite element method; locking plate; proximal humerus fracture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
About 20% of humerus fractures need a surgical treatment. Surgical options include closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, open reduction and internal fixation and prosthetic arthroplasty [1]. Recent studies have shown high failure rates after fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a range of 8.6% to 22%. Accordingly, loss of reduction and screw cut-out are the most common reasons for a revision or reoperation surgery [2]. Is thought that the above can occur due to the great rigidity of the implant, which could increases the stress between the implant-bone interfaces leading to the screw cut-out. However, excessively elastic implants lead to premature failure [3]. This study aims to examine 3 main properties (and interactions) in the locking plates design, allowing to estimate the optimal scenarios using the finite element method (FEM) and design of experiments (DOE).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Bjoernsen L. P., 2016, EMERGENCY MED COMPRE
[2]   Biomechanical study of different plate configurations for distal humerus osteosynthesis [J].
Bogataj, M. ;
Kosel, F. ;
Norris, R. ;
Krkovic, M. ;
Brojan, M. .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2015, 53 (05) :381-392
[3]   Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone [J].
Clavert, Ph. ;
Zerah, M. ;
Krier, J. ;
Mille, P. ;
Kempf, J. F. ;
Kahn, J. L. .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2006, 28 (06) :581-587
[4]   Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures [J].
Krappinger, Dietmar ;
Bizzotto, Nicola ;
Riedmann, Stephan ;
Kammerlander, Christian ;
Hengg, Clemens ;
Kralinger, Franz Sebastian .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (11) :1283-1288
[5]  
McMahon P. J., 2014, CURRENT DIAGNOSIS TR
[6]  
Sawacha Z., 2014, Modelling Methodology for Physiology and Medicine, VSecond, P527
[7]   Proximal periarticular locking plates in proximal humeral fractures: functional outcomes [J].
Schulte, Leah M. ;
Matteini, Lauren E. ;
Neviaser, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (08) :1234-1240
[8]   Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: A systematic review [J].
Thanasas, Christos ;
Kontakis, George ;
Angoules, Antonios ;
Limb, David ;
Giannoudis, Peter .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (06) :837-844
[9]  
Zhang Y. -K., 2016, BIOMECHANICAL EFFECT